That is a nice staff. But it is not $8 nice.
Ok, I must know! What are the gold trim chest, legs and boot transmogs?
Didn’t people say this was going to happen when it was pulled from EU?Color me surprised. I guess it’s better than the full transmog sets that will never grace the trading post (or were originally marked for it and then hotfixed to show it wasn’t).
Well whoever said they would monetize the trading post was right...how depressing. It's like they are addicted to being @#$% ups.
Early access for those that cant wait, at an actual affordable price instead of the $25 price tag they could have slapped on it, or free down the line. I can't help but wonder though if they are releasing it early BECAUSE of their mess up of putting it on the trading post early.
Blatant cash grab for a monthly sub game.
a hat and a cloak, and not Atiesh.yeah no lmao.
I like this. They did say the trading post would be a way to get shop item for free. This is cool.
So this is basically Blizzard selling 975 Trader's Tender for $8, because you will then be able to spend the ones you receive between September and December on something else.
What does "through May 31" mean? After it? Before it? On?
More than half your monthly tenders for 1 of the items. Did the inflation actually leak into the game with fake currency too?
That's $8 going to a much better purpose, like a nice dinner. Absolutely no reason to spend money on this.
I like that it's getting to the trading post at some point, but 8$ for 3 items... that's a nope for me.
I'm not quite sure about this... per the announcement anything that goes on the TP will be available in future rotations, so this will "always" be available "for free" after it leaves the store. So there's no fomo in that regard.But that said, we're already a bit pinched for tenders and doing it this way manages to create some fomo in the opposite way - if you don't spend $8 *now*, you might not be able to afford it when it does come to the TP anyway because of the cost/resources ratio.I think this is the best way they could've done it (well, aside from not putting it on the store at all) to go with what the initial announcement said, but I'm not entirely satisfied. It's not spending money to get stuff you can get with tender, it's spending money to cut down on future tender costs... which is sorta the same thing but with an element of uncertainty sprinkled in