Diese Seite macht ausgiebigen Gebrauch von JavaScript.
Bitte aktiviert JavaScript in Eurem Browser.
Classic Aussehen
Thottbot Aussehen
Balance Druids Spec
Antwort verfassen
Zur Forenübersicht zurückkehren
Beitrag von
446969
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Beitrag von
hymer
Something within two spec slots of this:
http://www.wowhead.com/?talent#0EMfuVIRcdhVuRhZbxc0b
I certainly wouldn't recommend it, though. What is your specific situation?
Beitrag von
446969
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Beitrag von
hymer
The spec I just made up on the spot pretty much takes all the attainable abilities that up your damage. You'd be the epitome of OOMkin with that build.
If you want to take everything into account, moving around at the right moments, cutting exactly the amount of mana recovery, etc. go to elitist jerks. I'm sure they have the currently top spec for Balance over there somewhere.
It's basically a matter of knowing when/if you can shave off mana recovery and take additional damage instead. That depends on your raid composition and you gear.
Beitrag von
meowliekacat
Go starfall or go home.
Upon further review, that spec is just straight up bad.
Beitrag von
446969
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Beitrag von
olgamaster
Hymer has no idea what a good spec is.
Pure dps with no feral keeping up FF in the raid =
http://www.wowhead.com/?talent#0EMfuVIscdhVhouZbxczb:urf
pure dps with feral keeping up FF in the raid =
http://www.wowhead.com/?talent#0eMfuVIscdIVhouZbxc0b:urf
Beitrag von
meowliekacat
Something tells me genesis won't help as much as iFF. But what do I know...
Beitrag von
olgamaster
see my edit
Beitrag von
445666
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Beitrag von
hymer
Guys, it was my very POINT that the spec is useless. :)
Beitrag von
olgamaster
Then why post a spec at all - it only causes confusion. If someone asks for a spec don't post a horrible spec and then cryptically tell him you were kidding in a later post, you're only setting the OP up for the possibility of a mistake being made. Just say to go to EJ if thats what you want to say.
Beitrag von
hymer
Very well, I shall endavour to cause less confusion in the future. Just one question: What did you think I meant when I wrote
I certainly wouldn't recommend it, though.
?
Beitrag von
olgamaster
From the way you wrote it, it made it sound like you weren't recommending it due to the fact that it lacks mana regen, as opposed to the fact that it is simply a horrible spec. It is a situational spec that really only becomes viable once you have high enough gear levels and a consistent ideal raid setup, and it is generally not recommended unless you are really serious about doing decent dps. There could have been any number of reasons you said you don't recommend it, but it seems counter-intuitive to assume that you said so because it was bad, because you just posted it. Why would you post something that was bad and then tell someone it was bad?
Beitrag von
hymer
Now that it's sorted out, I'll just go edit my initial post, so we're sure nobody uses this spec. brb
Beitrag von
olgamaster
=D
Beitrag von
hashmel
54/0/13+4
split the last 4 between intensity and gale winds depending on your need for more mana regen or aoe damage
get a feel for the range of starfall asap and then use it whenever possible without losing control of it.
there is no real rotation for boomkin dps, it's more of a priority list and i'm glad blizz steared us that way.
be sure to get a faerie fire on the target then your dots then start with wrath.
wrath during starfall eclipses, starfall during wrath eclipses, refresh your dots between eclispes, treants when they're ready and there aren't aoes that'll waste them, and starfall whenever it's ready and safe to use.
typhoon is for pve fights like gluth and xt and pvp/soloing but for 1 talent it's well worth getting this niche spell
Beitrag von
107195
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Beitrag von
curlymon
I've been experimenting with which is better to start eclipse rotations. Spreadsheets may say different, but to me it feels I do more DPS starting with SF than wrath. Wrath may put out a little bit more dps, but I get my eclipse up faster by using SF. I've seen 5-7 wrath crits go by without a proc whereas I rarely go past 2 SF's to start my wrath spam with for uber DPS. I can easily chew through 40-60k health in one SF eclipse. I guess it just feels more reliable with SF.
Just my opinion.
2 SF = 4 wrath casts
Probabilistically using wrath to prob Lunar Eclipse is more likely by nearly 1% given the same time period spent casting.
Beitrag von
176018
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Antwort verfassen
Ihr seid nicht angemeldet. Bitte
meldet Euch an
, um eine Antwort einzusenden, oder
registriert Euch
falls Ihr noch nicht über ein Konto verfügt.