此站点大量使用JavaScript。
请在您的浏览器中启用JavaScript。
经典怀旧服主题
Thottbot主题
Drop by and say hi! (Recycle Bin)
发表回复
返回主列表
发布者
Hyperspacerebel
I said they were spelled the same, you said that they weren't because "B != b". This is how this entire debacle started.
No I did not say that. I said Bush =/= bush in reference to my post.
Bush and bush are pronounced the same, therefore they are the same thing.
QED
They're also spelled the same.
B =/= b
Counter-argument denied.
So, then why did you feel the need to respond?
B =/= b
Exactly. You imply that I'm saying bush and bush, and I'm reply no, I'm saying Bush and bush.
发布者
Adamsm
Wow, it's still going on?
发布者
107106
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
发布者
Deepthought
Exactly. You imply that I'm saying bush and bush, and I'm reply no, I'm saying Bush and bush.
No, I pointed out that they were spelled the same. That's all. I was making an (attempted) HUMOUROUS OBSERVATION IN RELATION TO YOUR POST
Just because the word "bush" is capitalized does not mean it is refering to the surname. Agree or Disagree?
发布者
Hyperspacerebel
Just because the word "bush" is capitalized does not mean it is refering to the surname. Agree or Disagree?
No, but the fact that I used it that way does.
发布者
Deepthought
Just because the word "bush" is capitalized does not mean it is refering to the surname. Agree or Disagree?
No, but the fact that I used it that way does.
But there is no indication that you are using it that way in your original post because it is at the start of a sentence and those are capitalized anyway..
发布者
Interest
Wow, it's still going on?
Yep.
发布者
Hyperspacerebel
But there is no indication that you are using it that way in your original post because it is at the start of a sentence and those are capitalized anyway..
Whether there is indication or not has no effect on what it is in fact referencing.
发布者
Deepthought
But there is no indication that you are using it that way in your original post because it is at the start of a sentence and those are capitalized anyway..
Whether there is indication or not has no effect on what it is in fact referencing.
We are not inside your head HSR, you must give indication of the way you intend to use a word or we will go for the simplest option and then things like the last 8 pages happen.
发布者
260787
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
发布者
Hyperspacerebel
But there is no indication that you are using it that way in your original post because it is at the start of a sentence and those are capitalized anyway..
Whether there is indication or not has no effect on what it is in fact referencing.
We are not inside your head HSR, you must give indication of the way you intend to use a word or we will go for the simplest option and then things like the last 8 pages happen.
There's no reason for me to give indication, because it's completely arbitrary to the point I was making. Which is why I told you that your capitalization issue was meaningless. It's also why I was pretty sure you didn't understand my point, because you kept pushing it even after I told you it was arbitrary.
发布者
107106
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
发布者
Interest
*Goes about making +1s in other threads..*
Just stop guys.
发布者
Hyperspacerebel
Just stop guys.
Why?
You can't give a good reason.
发布者
Deepthought
There no reason for me to give indication, because it's completely arbitrary to the point I was making.
Only considering the additonal context added later in the thread.
Which is why I told you that your capitalization issue was meaningless
If it was meaningless then why did you post stuff like "b=/=B"?
发布者
260787
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
发布者
Adamsm
Anyone have an popcorn?
发布者
260787
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
发布者
260787
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
发布者
Hyperspacerebel
Which is why I told you that your capitalization issue was meaningless
If it was meaningless then why did you post stuff like "b=/=B"?
Because you made an assumption about my post that wasn't true.
Let's say I write a post about how curved swords, like the Katana, are more efficient fighting intruments than straight swords, and then you replied that Katanas were not curved. Whether Katanas are curved or not is arbitrary to the point I was making, but I'm still going to respond to your post because it's wrong.
There no reason for me to give indication, because it's completely arbitrary to the point I was making.
Only considering the additonal context added later in the thread.
I did not add anything, I only explicated.
...and then Deepthought and Hyperspacerebel dueling till the end (which has yet to come).
DUEL, n. A formal ceremony preliminary to the reconciliation of two enemies. Great skill is necessary to its satisfactory observance; if awkwardly performed the most unexpected and deplorable consequences sometimes ensue. A long time ago a man lost his life in a duel.
发表回复
您没有登录。请
登录
发表回复或
注册
如果您还没有账号。