Should I Go Survival or Stay Marksmenship

Ответить

Вернуться на главную страницу форума

Сообщение от 346973

This post was from a user who has deleted their account.

Сообщение от 221451

This post was from a user who has deleted their account.

Сообщение от 355869

This post was from a user who has deleted their account.

Сообщение от TehTerokkar

I personally always prefer Marks for the easy "rotation", Surv has DoTs and I hate putting them back up.
Since in Marks ur Chimera Shot resets the duration of SS(and also some dmg through SS) and crits for +10K's, it's my favourite, seeing big crits, just gotta love it ;3

Сообщение от barbeque

You have enough passive ArP that either spec should be very close. You'll lose DPS when you're kiting on any fight, so ignore your results on Saurfang for the purposes of determining what's the best build.

Actually OP's passive ArP comes from gemming ArP. ArP gemming is not recommended until you can get about 700 passive ArP from gear alone. With this current gem-set, your performance as SV will not be optimal either.

With your current set up, I believe you'll see a DPS increase if you stay MM and switch all your gems to Agi instead of ArP.

But yes, kiting adds will reduce your DPS, so it is not a very good measure of damage output.

Сообщение от 346973

This post was from a user who has deleted their account.

Сообщение от realmlist

why does everyone say 'markmenship' when the real word is marksmanship?

anyway, i personally prefer MM for PvE.
with a good amount of ArP i managed to get 8k DPS.(also other goo stuff, but ArP was the main thing).

http://www.wowhead.com/?forums&topic=140965&p=1789256#post-reply
what hunter and what ArP? u said u never played huntsman before.