Данный сайт активно использует технологию JavaScript.
Пожалуйста, включите JavaScript в вашем браузере.
Live
PTR
10.2.7
PTR
10.2.6
Бета
Let's talk about seat belt laws
Ответить
Вернуться на главную страницу форума
Сообщение от
Hyperspacerebel
Now what I want to see, is Hyperspacerebel, and TheMediator stuck in a room together. And see who comes out alive...
TheMediator. He'd eat me to stay alive QQ
;)
Сообщение от
TheMediator
Now what I want to see, is Hyperspacerebel, and TheMediator stuck in a room together. And see who comes out alive...
TheMediator. He'd eat me to stay alive QQ
;)
I've been reading up on the subject about necessity as a defense for murder and its moral implications, and I've concluded the most ethical approach to filling my belly in such a situation is that I eat my own urine and feces until you die of starvation, after which I eat your corpse.
Heh.
Сообщение от
124027
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Сообщение от
Hyperspacerebel
no government law, just the law of natural selection.
Enjoy flying through your own windscreen as you are hit from behind by a bad driver.
He means that smart people will wear their seat belts anyways, so all the not-smart people will get killed off.
Сообщение от
TheMediator
Just stick with the urine. You only need to last long enough for one of you to die of dehydration.
It seems like it'd be such a shame to let all that chocolate go to waste.
Сообщение от
Hyperspacerebel
Just stick with the urine. You only need to last long enough for one of you to die of dehydration.
It seems like it'd be such a shame to let all that chocolate go to waste.
It'll just make you thirstier.
lols
Сообщение от
124027
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Сообщение от
393249
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Сообщение от
Hyperspacerebel
If you drive fast enough, this question becomes irrelevant.
I'd rather die from a snapped neck, not from skidding 50 yards down the pavement.
Сообщение от
129077
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Сообщение от
383613
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Сообщение от
165617
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Сообщение от
Skyfire
If you drive fast enough, this question becomes irrelevant.
This made me laugh.
Сообщение от
Hyperspacerebel
In the UK, each road traffic accident costs the taxpayer, on average, in excess of a million pounds (police, ambulances, tow trucks, scraping people off the roads, sticking them back together again, disability benefits, etc) and also damages the economy (insurance payouts, loss of earnings, etc.).
As long as I'm paying tax, you can wear a god damn seatbelt.
Seat belts in no way reduce the number of crashes.
Сообщение от
383613
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Сообщение от
165617
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Сообщение от
Hyperspacerebel
If you read my scenario they in fact do. The reason is that a seatbelt keeps you in your seat better and allows you to take sharper turns without flying around in your seat. I have been in numerous different occasions where simply wearing a seat belt has prevented an accident.
Summing up your
argument
earlier I got:
If you wear a seat-belt you can pull of slightly reckless moves more easily.
I don't think that's any basis for the claim that seat-belts prevent accidents.
Ответить
Вы не авторизованы.
Войдите
или
зарегистрируйтесь
, чтобы оставить сообщение.