Данный сайт активно использует технологию JavaScript.
Пожалуйста, включите JavaScript в вашем браузере.
Live
PTR
10.2.7
PTR
10.2.6
Бета
Do you plan to watch the State of the Union?
Ответить
Вернуться на главную страницу форума
Сообщение от
393249
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Сообщение от
Deepthought
If Obama made speeches this successful more often he might actually be able to get things done.
If by successful you mean full of empty political rhetoric, then sure... there were some ideas in the speech that sounded good, but I'll believe it when I see it.
By successful, I mean;
83% of speech watchers approve of the proposals the president made in his speech tonight. 17% Disapprove.
70% of speech watchers think Barack Obama shares the same priorities for the country as they do. 57% thought so before the speech.
59% of speech watchers think that Barack Obama has a clear plan for creating jobs. 40% thought so before the speech.
72% of speech watchers approve of Barack Obama's plans for dealing with government spending. 28% Disapprove.
56% of speech watchers think Barack Obama's economic plans will reduce the budget deficit in the long run, and 71% think they will help ordinary Americans.
Сообщение от
Adamsm
If Obama made speeches this successful more often he might actually be able to get things done.
If by successful you mean full of empty political rhetoric, then sure... there were some ideas in the speech that sounded good, but I'll believe it when I see it.
By successful, I mean;
83% of speech watchers approve of the proposals the president made in his speech tonight. 17% Disapprove.
70% of speech watchers think Barack Obama shares the same priorities for the country as they do. 57% thought so before the speech.
59% of speech watchers think that Barack Obama has a clear plan for creating jobs. 40% thought so before the speech.
72% of speech watchers approve of Barack Obama's plans for dealing with government spending. 28% Disapprove.
56% of speech watchers think Barack Obama's economic plans will reduce the budget deficit in the long run, and 71% think they will help ordinary Americans.
Hoorah for made up numbers lol?
Сообщение от
Deepthought
Hoorah for made up numbers lol?
"Welp guys polls are useless BECAUSE I SAY SO, hell I'm not really sure about maths as a whole actu- "*disappears from existance*
Сообщение от
Adamsm
Hoorah for made up numbers lol?
"Welp guys polls are useless BECAUSE I SAY SO, hell I'm not really sure about maths as a whole actu- "*disappears from existance*
Dude, look at your second and last one.... 2nd = 127%, last one is also 127%.....
Сообщение от
393249
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Сообщение от
393249
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Сообщение от
Adamsm
They are not mutually exclusive poll options from the same question ... they are two seperate yes/no questions grouped together because they are dealing with a similar topic.
Wouldn't it have more sense to split them up as two then... also... why poll the speech writers? Why not poll real people instead of those who make a living making politicians look good lol?
Сообщение от
Deepthought
Hoorah for made up numbers lol?
"Welp guys polls are useless BECAUSE I SAY SO, hell I'm not really sure about maths as a whole actu- "*disappears from existance*
Dude, look at your second and last one.... 2nd = 127%, last one is also 127%.....
Did you even read the post?
Second quote: 57% BEFORE THE SPEECH, 70% AFTER (this was clearly indicated in the quote BTW)
Last one: the 56% and 71% are not exclusive of each other, read the quote again.
Wouldn't it have more sense to split them up as two then... also... why poll the speech writers? Why not poll real people instead of those who make a living making politicians look good lol?
You didn't even read the quote, did you?
speech
watchers
WATCHERS
Сообщение от
TheMediator
Hoorah for made up numbers lol?
"Welp guys polls are useless BECAUSE I SAY SO, hell I'm not really sure about maths as a whole actu- "*disappears from existance*
Dude, look at your second and last one.... 2nd = 127%, last one is also 127%.....
50% of coin tosses are heads and ~83% of dice rolls are not 6. ZOMG THAT IS MORE THAN 100% WTF HOW !
I laughed. Think before you make comments.
Сообщение от
Adamsm
Wouldn't it have more sense to split them up as two then... also... why poll the speech writers? Why not poll real people instead of those who make a living making politicians look good lol?
You didn't even read the quote, did you?
speech
watchers
WATCHERS
Hoorah for made up numbers lol?
"Welp guys polls are useless BECAUSE I SAY SO, hell I'm not really sure about maths as a whole actu- "*disappears from existance*
Dude, look at your second and last one.... 2nd = 127%, last one is also 127%.....
50% of coin tosses are heads and ~83% of dice rolls are not 6. ZOMG THAT IS MORE THAN 100% WTF HOW !
I laughed. Think before you make comments.
In the nicest way possible: Eat me. I'm running on like 2 hours of sleep here. So, yes I misread.
Сообщение от
TheMediator
Go to sleep then. Why are you on wowhead when you're tired?
Сообщение от
393249
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Сообщение от
Adamsm
Go to sleep then. Why are you on wowhead when you're tired?
Cause I'm having one of my insomnia days. No point trying to sleep till I actually fall over lol.
Сообщение от
TheMediator
That doesn't sound healthy.
Сообщение от
Adamsm
Not a healthy person; I've had these bouts since High School. I just suffer through and wait for my body to tell my head to go to sleep.
Сообщение от
Monday
Not a healthy person; I've had these bouts since High School. I just suffer through and wait for my body to tell my head to go to sleep.
ARGH I hate those. Been running all week with no caffeine and 4-5.5 hours of sleep a day.
Сообщение от
Orranis
Right now.
He is discussing this right now on Fox.
You watch Fox news. That explains
everything!
But seriously, you had better go to therapy right now to undo the damage they've done.
Isn't Fox News a comedy network?
Also a news network.
The news network is funnier than the comedy though, and the comedy includes both Family Guy and the Simpsons.
If Obama made speeches this successful more often he might actually be able to get things done.
You mean get a second term. Words ≠ Actions. I fear Obama has been far to passive this term.
Сообщение от
Deepthought
You mean get a second term. Words ≠ Actions. I fear Obama has been far to passive this term.
He is passive because despite being center-right he promised relatively "liberal" (for America) policies, but when he sees his falling poll numbers he decides to shift to the right in the hope of catching voters who are on the right but not enough-so to be considered Republican. However, in doing this he makes it harder to get his "liberal" policies through and so he ends up flip-flopping in the middle.
What I'm saying is, if he could make a speech like this one that would raise his poll numbers like this one did (see above) more often, he would not be compelled to move to the right and thus would be able to focus on getting things done.
This is assuming that we accept A) The Democatic and Republican parties are fundementally different and B) Obama actually has a interest in passing said "liberal" policies. Both of these points I am not sure on, but that is a topic for a different time.
Сообщение от
Hyperspacerebel
Obama center-right?
...
Ответить
Вы не авторизованы.
Войдите
или
зарегистрируйтесь
, чтобы оставить сообщение.