Of all the questions to answer, and poorly at that.....
red shirt guy still got dem
Interesting! what about those shadows from The Maw, like Sylvanas's chains for example.. is that Domination magic or maybe is the necromancy from that place?
man wouldnt it be cool if they used the tens of thousands of words in quest text in an expansion to answer the big questions like this?
Or...or...OR... give us this kind of context in game for a change. Context in external media like novels or animated shorts is one thing. The amount of expository context we get on twitter or in twitch interviews is kinda pathetic.
Future updates..... hmm potential necromancer class?
This is interesting and makes some sense. I do agree there should be a way to have it explained in-game though. At this point I wouldn't ask for much more than a lorewalker item that summons a vision of a lorewalker who spouts tidbits about whatever area you're in similar to the talking artifacts in Legion. An in-game book would be nicer, haven't had those in years.
All he did was explain what necromancy was...but its not necromancy because he says it isn't?
I think one of the biggest mistakes in WoW lore is the Soul is not immortal.
I huess it is not obvious to some people. but necromancy has LITERALLY ALWAYS BEEN LIKE THIS. in wow, or other games. its about raising a body, and moving souls is the pinnacle of it. you dont need a soul to raise a basic zombie, just a body. also about the peopel crying about "WhY Is It NoT ExPlAiNeD InGaMe?oneone" did you try reading the actual tweet? here, ill provide a snippet of it: "I agree the wording for that text is unclear. It will be clarified in a future update."
why explain anything when everything is retconned at a whim. if they don't care about their story's consistency why should I?