Este site faz uso extensivo de JavaScript.
Favor habilite JavaScript em seu navegador.
No ar
RTP
10.2.7
RTP
10.2.6
Beta
Who is your hero?
Retornar ao índice do fórum
Postado por
Sagramor
Mah Dad.
Win.
Not really.
(
Outside your faimlly,please
..and sorry if this has been done..i couldnt find it if it has :P)
Postado por
TheMediator
If a person is depressed it does not necessarily mean she's an unhappy person. Sure, at that moment something happened that made her sad, but overall she is a happy person. Happy people get depressed sometimes, just as the contrary.
Yes it does. Depression is the inability to be happy.
I'm not even gonna answer that.
The Wowhead community needs to learn how to debate.
Uhh... no. You don't get debated with when you just throw words together without knowing what they mean.
Postado por
Sagramor
You don't get debated with when you don't understand your opponent's comments and just throws a repetitive answer, forcing them to repeat themselves, thus creating an infinite cycle of fail.
Postado por
Skreeran
House is a FICTIONAL character. He's whatever the writer say he is.....Please refer to my earlier post.
He might as well be real. All these other "real people" you see on tv all share the same video box.
If House is portrayed as a realistic human being, functionally he's as real as anyone else on tv.
Postado por
GoGoGodzilla
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Postado por
Wrassinn
Godzilla
Postado por
Sagramor
I'M NOT ANGRY DAMNIT!
Seriously, though, I'm not angry. I'm just pointing out facts.
Postado por
TheMediator
You don't get debated with when you don't understand your opponent's comments and just throws a repetitive answer, forcing them to repeat themselves, thus creating an infinite cycle of fail.
I don't want you to repeat yourself. Come up with something not dumb or leave.
Postado por
Sagramor
You don't get debated with when you don't understand your opponent's comments and just throws a repetitive answer, forcing them to repeat themselves, thus creating an infinite cycle of fail.
I don't want you to repeat yourself. Come up with something not dumb or leave.
Come up with something that is based on my last argument or leave. Or go the MyTie's Class on Internet Debates.
Good day.
Postado por
Wrassinn
You don't get debated with when you don't understand your opponent's comments and just throws a repetitive answer, forcing them to repeat themselves, thus creating an infinite cycle of fail.
I don't want you to repeat yourself. Come up with something not dumb or leave.
You don't post really anything that helps move the threads along do you?
Postado por
TheMediator
You don't get debated with when you don't understand your opponent's comments and just throws a repetitive answer, forcing them to repeat themselves, thus creating an infinite cycle of fail.
I don't want you to repeat yourself. Come up with something not dumb or leave.
Come up with something that is based on my last argument or leave. Or go the MyTie's Class on Internet Debates.
Good day.
Here's my response to your last argument... you don't know what depression means.
Postado por
Skreeran
You don't get debated with when you don't understand your opponent's comments and just throws a repetitive answer, forcing them to repeat themselves, thus creating an infinite cycle of fail.
If I recall, this debate started because I said I'd rather be right than happy. This means that if I have to choose between being a normal happy human being who believes that someone loves them, they have a purpose and value, and that they won't really die, or believing the truth, I would rather be right. What I believe doesn't make me happy, in fact, when I review it in my head or on paper, it makes me even more depressed. Thus, I would rather believe what I think is right, even though it does not make me happy, than believe something that seems to be a lie that would make me happier.
Postado por
150866
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Postado por
289682
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Postado por
GoGoGodzilla
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Postado por
TheMediator
You don't get debated with when you don't understand your opponent's comments and just throws a repetitive answer, forcing them to repeat themselves, thus creating an infinite cycle of fail.
I don't want you to repeat yourself. Come up with something not dumb or leave.
Come up with something that is based on my last argument or leave. Or go the MyTie's Class on Internet Debates.
Good day.
Here's my response to your last argument... you don't know what depression means.
Generally, a good debater would explain what it
does
mean.
Happiness and Depression are mutually exclusive. The feeling of happiness is when the pleasure center of your brain is simulated. When you're depressed, the trigger fires less often or never, and so you don't feel happy even when you do things that should make you feel happy.
So unless you have some faulty wiring in your brain that's causing your pleasure center to go off when you feel pain (masochism), being in pain does NOT make you happy. I think you're confusing what you feel is morally right with what makes you happy. I'd feel that sacrificing myself for the safety of my family would be right, but that doesn't mean I'd feel happy about doing it.
Quoting myself from BEFORE he made his comments.
Postado por
289682
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Postado por
172996
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Postado por
Skreeran
House is a FICTIONAL character. He's whatever the writer say he is.....Please refer to my earlier post.
He might as well be real. All these other "real people" you see on tv all share the same video box.
If House is portrayed as a realistic human being, functionally he's as real as anyone else on tv.
An actor playing a fictional character does not mean that the character is real. The actor is real, no doubt, but the character they are portraying isn't.
The initial comparison was between Colbert and House..... Colbert is a real person on TV, not an actor protraying a character. Sure there are funny stories and whatnot, but he is a real person. House is a character created with made up problems and issues. To compare a real person to a made up character is silly.
Characters in TV shows are not real, regardless if they appear to be. Everything in that TV world is fictional and make believe, controlled by the writers and creators of that show.
Colbert has writers too.
Besides, have you ever met any of the "real people" you meet on television? They affect me personally just as much as a fictional character. Functionally, they might as well be the same.
A real person thinks up what House says, a real person portrays him. A real person thinks of what Colbert says, and a real person portrays him. Real people on television might as well be characters, because neither they nor character are connected with my tangible reality. I can't talk to them, affect them, nor can they affect me. The only things I see about them is what I see on television, just like a charactr in a television show. The line between is only that the real person happens to have a body somewhere, while the character does not. But neither mean any more in my personal existance than the other.
Postado por
172996
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Resposta da Mensagem
Esse tópico está trancado. Você não pode postar uma resposta.
