oh wow another blizzard character that stands against systemic injustice with anything other than stoic pacifism is instantly the villain... big surprise how original
For all those who see this conflict as morally grey:It's hard to call it "morally grey" when you portray humans as a-holes from the beginning, because this make some fans get "they deserved it" approach, especially since humans were shown to be responsible for all this *&^%.Also if anyone thinks that violence is the only mean to achieve something, then no, is not. Ramattra with his own actions gives anti-omnics the arguments against omnics to their hand, he only proves their point why they all should be considered a menace to humanity.
He looks like a new fun tank to play. Can't wait.
So another anti-overwatch hero. Its feeling very weird having these heroes that contradict what overwatch stands for and (story wise) how it makes any sense for them to be apart of it. What happens when the archives event comes around and u pick up while playing Null Sector? Just doesnt make sense. The same kind of thing can be said about the “junkerwatch” heroes who for some reason are apart of overwatch but have no real affiliation with it. It would be nice if they would add in affiliation tags like icons/symbols/sub groups to represent teams. It could make for alot of unique game modes and ideas. Junker queen, roadhog, junkrat are only 3 but should be in there own sub grp. Reaper, widow, cassady, moira, and (gengi who is also apart of overwatch?) are blackwatch heroes. It kind just makes these hero stories and values feel pointless when there not fighting for there cause in the first place. It would be nice to have sub teams that u earn unique rewards for by playing certain comps or playing x games with a hero affiliated with x.
