There is no honor in this its absolutely vile they weren't kidding with her making garry look like an amature Syl is completely with out redemption at this point. and I play an undead as my main this is not the Sylvanas we used to know our dark protector is dead and gone all that is left is a monster that is just as bad as putricide.
hey guys remember when blizzard tried to claim that forsaken have free willalso why the !@#$ doesn't baine just set derek free instead of endlessly whining about it?
why would jaina, a survivor of the zombie apocalipsis who literally saw it first hand how the dead were turned into weapons would get anywhere near close to derek knowing that he was revived by sylvanas,the warchief of the horde?and why the hell use derek to try to kill the proudmoores and not an actual assassin?i guess that rip mama proudmoore, she is sooo dead. since we know that she lets her emotions drive her decisions. and really ? this is the horde masterplan? that their entire war effort depends on luck and stupidity combined and hopefully he will kill jaina at the risk of enrage her more and push a more vengeful agenda on horde civilians?
Players: Surely the lore can't get any more awful?Blizzard: :)
Why doesn't Sylvanas just resurrect King Rastakhan?
It's obvious we're supposed to side with Sourfang, no matter what Blizzard claims about player "choice". Which is too bad. He's a pathetic, weak, fat, traitorous Orc who puts his personal feelings above that of the Horde. On the one hand, I suppose I should be happy that the story is all about the Horde this expansion, with the Alliance just serving as a prop piece. But, on the other hand, this terribly juvenile "plot" they're putting Horde players through is so bad that I actually wish the game would go back to putting most of the story in books, etc, and leave it out of the game so most of us can ignore whatever tripe narrative they've got going on for us in BfA. Lastly, the Alliance apologists who pretend they're for the Horde while crying whenever we do something "bad" to the Alliance...all the /facepalms. Newsflash: We're the Horde, not the Alliance. We WANT all the worst and terrible things for the Alliance, not to bake them pies and fluff their pillows. Clearly, from a meta point of view, Blizzard isn't going to let Sylvanas actually "win", and the part of the player base that doesn't have sex dreams over an adolescent boy king will have to stomach him "saving" the day at some point, but until that point rolls around, she-and we,the Horde players-had better have done enough to the Alliance to make that coming nausea of Anduin's victory somewhat bearable.
>Slyvanas creates plague and kills plenty of "innocents" with it.>Slyvanas raises thousands from dead to fight for her>Slyvanas raising one alliance person from dead with intent to use them as a sleeper agentAnd all of a sudden that's going too far? My 13 year old son can write a better story than this garbage.
Honestly all of this is just par for the course for Blizzard.I mean how many retcons have been in the WoW universe so far?I'd say about... seven major ones. What are they? Hard to tell really.I'd say I'm upset over the story but I really don't think any of the other expansions have been good either. Say what you will about Wrath but if you really just think about it? It's just a standard, "Kill the Evil Big Bad Guy" thing as every other game. Arthas/Lich King doesn't even have any depth to him, he's just... evil. Aside from that he's a nobody. If we saw more Arthas from the Lich King then maybe he'd be more interesting.
So uhhh... What kind of mount do you think Sylvanas will drop when we kill her?