Oh my, the day BM Hunters drop below Survival Hunters......9.0.5 can't come soon enough.
In a perfect world this artical would be relevant.That list is not correct and some classes are performing way better then this is showing. DK's is currently extremly strong with hunters + warlocks
3rd month of shadowlands and warrior is still the worst class to bring to raid, literally just there to do battle shout
look at rogs man a pure dps class :))
A++: Boomies, Affliction (+10%)A: Fire, Spriest, WW (+5%)B: <Any of the 12 DPS specs I don’t mention> (0%)C: Havoc, Enhance (-2%)D: Arms, Ass (-4%)F: Sub, Survival (-6%)F-: BM (-8%)Like isn’t it clear that B ranked classes should be used as the measuring stick?A++ classes are more above B than F classes are behind.
It's so sad... All of those DPS rankings, logs etc. should be forbidden/banned, because it is so hard to play with favourite specialization of your class - Survival Hunt, Feral Druid, Demonology Warlock etc. always this other spec is twice as good. Even if Survival can out-dps Marksman and Feral can easily out-dps Balance, there is still something in back of your head that you're playing worst spec, or pug leader is not going to invite you on +7 as 210 Demonology Warlock, because he/she saw those kind of logs with no comprehension.
What do you even mean warrior is only there for buff? Our warrior is pumping 6-8k on bosses and getting 95-98% logs if you don’t have a good warrior then so be it but a good player will always make it work and this counts for every class
71k MM logs to 331 SV logs (and 6k BM), I guess there really are the "dozens" of Survival players that they meme about... Imagine if Survival was actually REALLY good but nobody knew because it's so underplayed due to the stigma of it being awful
Nope. This is ENTIRELY the fault of Blizzard and it's game design.Timed runs DO breed toxicity, even if you need to cooperate your party members are your "enemies", because they can actively "hurt" your gameplay experience by not playing well enough, not using CC's, interrupts, etc.There is no real reason why Blizzard cannot make A LOT more frequent balance hotfixes. They left specs untouched for 2 years!It's the same as climate change, we bash Avg.Joe because he doesn't recycle (=ie not inviting underpowered specs), while big corps are responsible for 80% of global CO2 production (=ie Blizzard not giving a sh-- about balance)
These summaries are not helpful at all as they are most surface level and give incorrect implications.The gap between the top performing specs and the (healthy) middle of the pack is partially driven by extrem outlier fights.Boomkin is performing great but the reason why they seem miles ahead is purely because of Council where they are 30% ahead (median) the 2nd ranked spec.
Still find it hilarious that blizz needed to nerf UH to the state it's at now yet druids are STILL at the spot they had when UH was topping charts, guess blizz wants them at #1, can't have no pesky melee at the top spot
When the actual hell are they going to nerf boomkin damage, its clearly OP.... guess the whole meta community plays them, so they can't upset them..............
It feels more of a popularity chart, rather than a performance chart.You can make a leap and say because its popular then it must be better performing but i dont think that is always the case.If you have all the best players only playing a few specs, then this further pushes down the other specs just because thay are not being played so much.If you have a lot invested in a class and spec you are less likely to change unless its an overwhelming benefit.
American grade school grading system.A = 90-100%B = 80-89%C = 75-79%D = 70-74%F = 69% or lower