이 사이트는 자바스크립트를 사용합니다.
브라우저에서 자바스크립트를 활성화 해주십시오.
라이브
PTR
10.2.7
PTR
10.2.6
베타
Why give BE warriors?
답글 달기
보드 인덱스로 돌아가기
128860
의 게시글
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
375923
의 게시글
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
379362
의 게시글
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
375923
의 게시글
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
379362
의 게시글
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
375923
의 게시글
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
92105
의 게시글
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Shiverlynn
의 게시글
Wow you're a good bit away from knowledge of lore:
Belfs are known for magic
Nelfs are known for nature
True but the blood elves are well-known for their tree-hugging attitude as well. Ever been to Quel'thalas? There are groves all over the place, and many quests are related to cleansing corrupted nature and stuff like that just like night elf ones.
They don't let the nature go wild and worship it like the NE do, but they definitely care a lot for it.
131092
의 게시글
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
taurenmoo812
의 게시글
Well if they do introduce Night Elf mages I hope they make it so they are not accepted by the rest of the Night Elf Society and have to work underground like the way Warlocks in Storm Wind are.
oh god just what the alliance needs, giving night elf males another caster class with there gut-churningly bad cast animation... smooth move blizzard
229054
의 게시글
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Adamsm
의 게시글
Don't make this mistake, High and Blood Elves also practice Druidism.Not as many though.
But anyways, the Sunwell is re-ignited from M'uru's sacrifice, so they have their energy source back. But I can't see BE's practicing shamanism, they have too much materialism to them, same as goblins, which makes even less sense.
The warrior class makes senses, as there have been warriors for both the BE and the NE's since the War of the Ancients.
ArgentSun
의 게시글
The warrior class makes senses, as there have been warriors for both the BE and the NE's since the War of the Ancients.
Yea... there is no reason not to give them warriors. Not all elves are rangers and sentinels - quite a few are plain simple melee warriors. You can see a lot of the NPCs being pure warriors.
Barkend
의 게시글
About the NE mages, they're just OP.
/cast Blink
/cast Shadowmeld
/lol
Lonestarr1337
의 게시글
Every race has warriors. Meat shields. Protectors of their own. That's a warrior.
469682
의 게시글
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Patty
의 게시글
This
is why.
Orranis
의 게시글
The Draeni are known for The Light.
The Blood Elves are known for magic.
The Tauren are known for the great hunt and druidism.
The Undead are known for The Shadow.
The Trolls are known for they're witchdoctors/ shadow hunters, now shamans.
The Orcs are known for there shamans and warlocks.
The Night Elves are known for druidism.
So yes, by your logic, only Humans (Who also could be known for worship of the light) and Dwarves (same), and Gnomes (Who are too small) can be warriors.
Because they can pick up a sword a swing it, is that so hard to understand?
Cadoan
의 게시글
Dosn't work both ways and Nelfs getting mages in the next pacth is a total mockery of lore,
This is NOT total mockery of lore... Know your lore, dammit! ;o
Ayline
의 게시글
The only thing I have to say is that Lore is not static.
If it were, we would never be allowed to fight Illidan, nor Arthas, nor Deathwing, nor Kael'Thas.
If lore were static, the game would be pointless, it would never change or evolve.
답글 달기
로그인이 되어있지 않습니다. 답글을 달려면
로그인
하거나, 계정이 없다면
회원가입
을 해 주세요.