이 사이트는 자바스크립트를 사용합니다.
브라우저에서 자바스크립트를 활성화 해주십시오.
라이브
PTR
10.2.7
PTR
10.2.6
베타
Ugh Cata Nerfs?
답글 달기
보드 인덱스로 돌아가기
355869
의 게시글
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Rilgon
의 게시글
Anyway, it's not bias; it's a bit of long-delayed justice, for all the abuse that the BM spec (and the people who played it) have endured.
And MM's justice for having more abuse thrown at it for even longer a period than BM is... where, exactly? (MM was not viable from 1.7 to 3.0.8 and even then was having to bite at SV's heels until roughly 3.2; BM was not viable only from 3.0.8 to current)
632573
의 게시글
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Interest
의 게시글
Anyway, it's not bias; it's a bit of long-delayed justice, for all the abuse that the BM spec (and the people who played it) have endured.
And MM's justice for having more abuse thrown at it for even longer a period than BM is... where, exactly? (MM was not viable from 1.7 to 3.0.8 and even then was having to bite at SV's heels until roughly 3.2; BM was not viable only from 3.0.8 to current)
You act like you take it personal, like Blizzard sat down and thought, "hmm there's this guy out there that
hates
BM and is madly and passionately in love with MM. His name is 'Rilgon', I think we should make BM
the
spec just to ruin his life."
You're right. It DOES sound like it.
632573
의 게시글
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
512617
의 게시글
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
632573
의 게시글
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
HoleofArt
의 게시글
Wild Hunter appears!
Go (any class)!
(Any class) uses (any ability).
It's Super-Effective!
Wild Hunter dies.
Interest
의 게시글
I really (really really) did not like the feel of focus in Marks. BM felt tolerable. On the bright side,
having a monstrosity of a pet could help with the minimum range issue.
I still say they should have changed the resource in name only and just made the bar a different color. If calling it focus made it feel more huntery, fine, but they really should have left the mechanics alone.
GC should definitely try to be in politics. I don't know if he would make it though; his crap seems to be pretty transparent. That nonsense about volley was blatantly ridiculous.
Took the words right out of my mouth.
Wild Hunter appears!
Go (any class)!
(Any class) uses (any ability).
It's Super-Effective!
Wild Hunter dies.
Warlock uses Banish?
HoleofArt
의 게시글
Wild Hunter appears!
Go (any class)!
(Any class) uses (any ability).
It's Super-Effective!
Wild Hunter dies.
Warlock uses Banish?
It's Super-Effective!
Wild Hunter dies.
Yes, even Banish.
wuvluv
의 게시글
I see alot of crying in this thread. Hunters got improved
the most
currently on the BETA and on the PTR. PvP wise hunters have never been better and Pve wise you are an arm and a leg ahead of everyone but one or two select class/specs.
512617
의 게시글
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
HoleofArt
의 게시글
I see alot of crying in this thread. Hunters got improved
the most
currently on the BETA and on the PTR. PvP wise hunters have never been better and Pve wise you are an arm and a leg ahead of everyone but one or two select class/specs.
4 words. Want to guess what they are?
You
Are
An
Idiot
170457
의 게시글
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
답글 달기
로그인이 되어있지 않습니다. 답글을 달려면
로그인
하거나, 계정이 없다면
회원가입
을 해 주세요.