이 사이트는 자바스크립트를 사용합니다.
브라우저에서 자바스크립트를 활성화 해주십시오.
라이브
PTR
10.2.7
PTR
10.2.6
베타
Destro Lock : A time to re-apply Immolate?
답글 달기
보드 인덱스로 돌아가기
566179
의 게시글
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
335609
의 게시글
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
asakawa
의 게시글
there's a couple of things to discount right away:
don't alter your rotation for pyro.
conflag's damage isn't actually related to the
current
immo on the target. (ie. if you cast immo under a damage proc which then runs out before you cast conflag you don't get a boost to conflag from the proc)
so what are we really talking about?
a 10% damage proc which occurs from immo ticks.
there is only one of the 5 ticks of immo that could proc the buff (the first one) that will not naturally lead to immo being recast with the buff anyway. so of the procs that do occur we're talking about only 1 in 5 of those.
immo has higher DPET than your other spells but you're still constantly casting throughout the buff so there is still benefit being gained.
any gain is off-set by the loss of ticks.
essentially, my best guess would be that it could be an overall (though incredibly slight) dps gain to clip immo on that 1in5 occasion if you clip directly after the second to last tick.
i do not think it would be anything like the kind of gain you'd want it to be to start having to complicate the rotation to that degree.
awebz
의 게시글
I could be wrong but I'm pretty sure that it's never a gain to clip any dot, ever.
And in this case it doesn't seem like it, but need some theorycrafting to confirm
566179
의 게시글
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
asakawa
의 게시글
you've basically got it but since a tick of immo is greater than 10% of a full immo (nuke+dot) it really is not worth doing what you're suggesting.
it's a nice buff that should not effect the spells you cast and when.
566179
의 게시글
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
413955
의 게시글
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
abulurd
의 게시글
20/20 hindsight, but wouldn't it have been better to do the tests before creating the post?
But if he had done the tests first then he wouldnt have posted, and there might be others out there who were wondering.
566179
의 게시글
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
asakawa
의 게시글
i think it was a fair question to ask. testing and theorycraft have slightly different uses. if he'd gone and tested it and found it to lower his dps then there would still be the question of would it be worth it after some work perfecting the new rotation. if theorycraft showed it to provide a big increase then it would be something worth working at (like affliction rolling buffs on corruption).
but, yes, if it was going to end up in some testing either way it might have been nice to have done that up-front.
답글 달기
로그인이 되어있지 않습니다. 답글을 달려면
로그인
하거나, 계정이 없다면
회원가입
을 해 주세요.