Ce site requiert JavaScript pour fonctionner.
Veuillez activer JavaScript dans votre navigateur.
Live
RPT
10.2.7
RPT
10.2.6
Bêta
Mists of Pandaria... Wait... What?
Répondre
Retourner à l'index
Publication par
Juuzou
So pretty much every expansion so far had a goal (end-boss)
At TBC it was to get Illidan down... At WotLK it was to get the LK down and at Cata it was to get DW down...
But now, at MoP, who for goodness sake do we have to get down? When I bought the expansions you could always see the "end-boss" at the cover... Will the "end-boss" now be some giant-ly proportioned Panda?
Seriously, I don't get this rather puzzling turn of events(##RESPBREAK##)8##DELIM##ElhonnaDS##DELIM##Please don't bypass the profanity filter.
Publication par
lonewolfe31705
It has been known since the xpac was announced that the final boss would be Garrosh.
And don't bypass the language filters with *. The mods don't like it and its against forum rules.
Publication par
Juuzou
It has been known since the xpac was announced that the final boss would be Garrosh.
And don't bypass the language filters with *. The mods don't like it and its against forum rules.
Didn't know either of that. But seriously... MoP's story line's kinda lame
Publication par
ElhonnaDS
It past expansions we've dealt with a number of the Old Gods. The Sha in Pandaria are seemingly the overshadowing nemesis in this expansion, as Deathwing, Illidan and the Lich King were in past expansions, and they are the remenants of a previously defeated Old God, so that is a continuation of the same set of arch-villains we've been fighting since Vanilla. They also noted that this expansion was supposed to be a return to the focus on the Horde-Alliance war, and so it should be much closer to the forefront than the "Big Baddie" that we've had in the last 3 expansions.
Publication par
Eccentrica
I disagree entirely that "MoPs storyline is kinda lame". Who knows how many rabbits Blizzard still has up their sleeve. Knowing exactly how things are going to pan out is extremely boring anyway. I prefer the unknown.
Publication par
Juuzou
It past expansions we've dealt with a number of the Old Gods. The Sha in Pandaria are seemingly the overshadowing nemesis in this expansion, as Deathwing, Illidan and the Lich King were in past expansions, and they are the remenants of a previously defeated Old God, so that is a continuation of the same set of arch-villains we've been fighting since Vanilla. They also noted that this expansion was supposed to be a return to the focus on the Horde-Alliance war, and so it should be much closer to the forefront than the "Big Baddie" that we've had in the last 3 expansions.
Now that's an answer I was hoping for, thanks dude :D
Publication par
ElhonnaDS
No problem, dude.(##RESPBREAK##)8##DELIM##ElhonnaDS##DELIM##
Publication par
Azrile
I think the story in MoP is far superior than the other expansion... which were just kinda ´ok, how long til we kill the end boss´.
With MoP, the story has snaked it´s way and is much more interesting. I think they made a mistake saying Garrosh is the endboss, but even still, the story is awesome because we don´t know why. Does he get corrupted by the Sha? Does he actually end up controlling the Sha and becomign too powerful for his own good? Does he fail with the Sha, and mindlessly butcher more trolls and BEs attempting it.. so much that the other leaders unite to otherthrow him.
Much better than BC and WOTLK where we just knew we were going to waltz into their strongehold and kill the final boss. No real story twists.
Publication par
1069282
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Publication par
193475
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Publication par
Adamsm
Considering the Sha are the living embodiment of an Old God, and now you find out that the Mogu are just androids doing their job...well, it's a hell of a lot better then the spaz writing of Cata, the pussification of the Lich King and the focus on the Emo-King in BC.
I say hear hear and bring out more storylines like MoP!
Publication par
Jurasco
Personally i love the MoP storyline, and I was one of the doubters when it was announced. By far the best of the storylines in my opinion.
Publication par
totemmunkey
Personally i love the MoP storyline, and I was one of the doubters when it was announced. By far the best of the storylines in my opinion.
I'd have to second this.
Publication par
ElhonnaDS
I think that if this same storyline existed, and the race they chose was not Pandaren, but was something less fluffy, and more tough-looking, that a lot of the people who have the "Freaking Pandas" mentality would find that they enjoy the story quite a bit. For the most part, regardless of the cartoonish nature of the race, most of the storylines are very serious and very well written, the humor is clever and very little of what is said or done is affected by the fact that they are chubby panda-people (except maybe half-hill), and not dragon-kin, or some other ripped, taloned, dangerous-looking race. I think that the appearance of the race is something that a lot of people couldn't get past, which is a shame because this is probably the best written expansion of the game. I find it funny that in a game where there are established races like murlocs, owlkin, furbolgs, tauren, worgen, centaurs, quillboars, naga, dryads, aarakoa, and ramkahen (some of which are much more cartoonish that the Pandaren, and many of which have been in the game since day 1), that there is an uproar about MoP suddenly catering to kids by putting in animal races.
Publication par
MikadoGG
+1 to what ElhonnaDS said. I think people are just stuck in this idea of hating the pandaren, like it's a trendy thing to do to complain about them being cartoony and childish when they are anything but. Most of the stories are not childish at all, with a handful of exceptions regarding their weight and boozing. I don't like them as a race purely visually (I started a panda monk only to delete it and restart a different race), but storyline-wise I don't see anything wrong with them or the expansion.
Répondre
Vous n'êtes pas connecté. Veuillez vous
connecter
pour répondre à ce sujet, ou
vous inscrire
si vous n'avez pas déjà un compte.