This site makes extensive use of JavaScript.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser.
Live
PTR
10.2.7
PTR
10.2.6
Beta
The Invisible Pink Unicorn says 2+2=5
Return to board index
Post by
ASHelmy
This won't end well.
I beg to differ, this forum's posters are actually quite mature.
Post by
150866
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
TheMediator
Or so I believe. And because I believe it, it must be accepted as equally at 2+2=4, even as invalid as it is.
Why do you feel the need to constantly mock us? Do you see me going around making posts mocking atheists?
Try it. You'd look silly. The reason I made this post is because I'm tried of people saying "You have to respect my opinion". No, no one has to respect your "opinion". If you're wrong, you're wrong.
I will not mock you. ok, let's get some facts straight:
A. You have no proof that I am wrong.
B. The holy books have never been wrong, no mistakes has been found in them ( at least the qu'ran) scientific or otherwise.
C. I have proof to back me up, you won't believe, but that's ok, it doesn't matter.
D. Most religious people, do NOT deny scientific theories or claims. Those who do are simply misguided.
E. Even if I am wrong, I am still entitled to my opinion, as long as I do not harm you in anyway (which I don't).
I'll take you point by point.
A. You have no proof that I am wrong.
You have no prove you are right. By default you are assumed wrong according to the scientific method. Other more logical theories have evidence pointing towards their correctness.
B. The holy books have never been wrong, no mistakes has been found in them ( at least the qu'ran) scientific or otherwise.
I'm not experienced with the Qur'an, but from what I understand that it makes reference to the Old Testament, which is utter bull&*!@, so I can imagine that if the Qur'an references it, then more than likely it has bull!@#$ elements as well.
C. I have proof to back me up, you won't believe, but that's ok, it doesn't matter.
Common sidestep to seem credible without actually having any credibility. Watch the atheist experience, a lot of callers make this claim. All it does is make you look dumb.
D. Most religious people, do NOT deny scientific theories or claims. Those who do are simply misguided. So you don't deny the Big Bang Theory, Abiogenesis, and Evolution? Doesn't leave much room for a god at all.
E. Even if I am wrong, I am still entitled to my opinion, as long as I do not harm you in anyway (which I don't).
Correct, you can think whatever you want to think, but it doesn't mean you're right, and I am entitled to make fun of you.
Post by
DethByAirplnPnut
/win to TheMediator
Post by
buzz3070
wait did you know that 1 + 1 = window? the invisible pink unicorn told me so
(think about it)
Post by
68759
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
DethByAirplnPnut
and that 3+3=octopus? invisible pink unicorn told me that too
Post by
150866
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Discover
I'll take the liberty and respond to this thread as to why I would've locked it as well. Hopefully this will clear up some confusion.
Starting a thread by trying to be cute in an otherwise somewhat touchy manner is not a great way to ensure its survival. If a subject is to be discussed, especially one in which a thread was previously locked, it should be civil and more substantial than starting with what seems to be an immature rebuttal.
We moderators need to tell the future sometimes in order to do our jobs. :) If you have any questions about the actions of myself or any of my fellow moderators, please make sure to email feedback@wowhead.com. Thank you.
Post Reply
This topic is locked. You cannot post a reply.