This site makes extensive use of JavaScript.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser.
Live
PTR
10.2.7
PTR
10.2.6
Beta
Racism or Patriotism?
Post Reply
Return to board index
Post by
Deepthought
The difference between North Korea and Iran is that North Korea actually fired one of those missiles.
Sure, it was a test. But it still broke international law.
Hahaha,
America
citing International law as a reason for being worried about Korea. /rolleyes
Post by
Sagramor
The difference between North Korea and Iran is that North Korea actually fired one of those missiles.
Sure, it was a test. But it still broke international law.
Hahaha,
America
citing International law as a reason for being worried about Korea. /rolleyes
I'm not from the US(if that's what you meant by America). Next time try to come up with a valid argument, kthxbai.
Post by
Deepthought
The difference between North Korea and Iran is that North Korea actually fired one of those missiles.
Sure, it was a test. But it still broke international law.
Hahaha,
America
citing International law as a reason for being worried about Korea. /rolleyes
I'm not from the US(if that's what you meant by America). Next time try to come up with a valid argument, kthxbai.
I quoted you but did not aim it at you. You just reminded me that I could make a
EDGY
comment, so I did.
Post by
95916
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
135207
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Deepthought
Just ask Saddam.
Hm yes. That situation, which was
TOTALLY
the same as the NK one ATM, was resolved peacefully and without loss of life, and the area is now peaceful and calm, all tension completely defused. Or that's how I think it went, right?
Saddam also was far better armed, could wipe citys of the face of the Earth, while NK isn't really that well armed, M I RIGHT?
Post by
211590
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
342791
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
112775
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Sagramor
The mentality you suck we rule, is the real reason why we have wars in first place..
We have wars for money, for religion, for resources. The mentality we rule they suck is only used to make sure the people agree with the war.
Post by
MyTie
The mentality you suck we rule, is the real reason why we have wars in first place..
We have wars for money, for religion, for resources. The mentality we rule they suck is only used to make sure the people agree with the war.
I suppose Iraq was a much better place with Saddam in power. Good point.
Post by
Sagramor
MyTie, the annoying thing about you is that I can never figure out when you're being sarcastic...
Post by
Laihendi
Iraq being in the middle of a 3-way civil war is much better than with Hussein in power.
Post by
85162
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Patty
Fact: English people are not patriotic. That's mainly an American thing.
Lulwut? That's got to be the biggest load of crap I think I have ever heard. >.>
Ok, some English people dislike the Queen, royal family etc. but there are many loyalists, my mum included, go say that English people aren't patriotic after you have actually been around England. :S
This isn't intended as a flame post, however I think that what you are saying is a load of bollocks, from experience.
And for the record, yes I do live in England.
Post by
MyTie
MyTie, the annoying thing about you is that I can never figure out when you're being sarcastic...
Allow common sense to be your guide, if you have any.
Post by
Sagramor
Okay...non-sarcasm?
Post by
MyTie
Okay...non-sarcasm?
Pie... and kittens.
And also someone referenced me on page 1 or 2... something about me criticising the fact that French helped us in our revolution to not having references... Something by Laihendi or something.... I hope you were joking.
On topic: A nation is not a race. Nationalism therefore, is not racism.
The French: I hold no ill will toward them or thier country. They did help in our revolution, argueably for personal gain, but nonetheless, it is appreciated. More recent history has been a little rediculous toward the french. I think they have thier own immigration and social problems. Muslim riots in 2006 I believe... Anyway, I'm no expert on French current events. I certainly don't dislike them.
Post by
Sagramor
Okay...non-sarcasm?
Pie... and kittens.
I fail at understanding your answer.
Post by
260787
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post Reply
You are not logged in. Please
log in
to post a reply or
register
if you don't already have an account.