This site makes extensive use of JavaScript.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser.
Live
PTR
10.2.7
PTR
10.2.6
Beta
Time travel.
Post Reply
Return to board index
Post by
Laihendi
Laihendi isn't solely responsible for any thread being locked unless it's one he made himself, and even then sometimes he isn't solely responsible (if at all).
Post by
TheMediator
Laihendi isn't solely responsible for any thread being locked unless it's one he made himself, and even then sometimes he isn't solely responsible (if at all).
Uhh... no. You're a troll and you $%^& people off to lock good threads.
Post by
225644
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Sagramor
OH MY GAWD IT'S TRAZURA!
Post by
Laihendi
Laihendi isn't solely responsible for any thread being locked unless it's one he made himself, and even then sometimes he isn't solely responsible (if at all).
Uhh... no. You're a troll and you $%^& people off to lock good threads.
Laihendi says something... and a bunch of people go "omg u can't say that" and then some big argument starts out (consisting of more people than just Laihendi, mind you) and then the thread gets locked.
On topic:
In 1994, the Mexican physicist Miguel Alcubierre proposed a method of stretching space in a wave which would in theory cause the fabric of space ahead of a spacecraft to contract and the space behind it to expand. The ship would ride this wave inside a region known as a warp bubble of flat space. Since the ship is not moving within this bubble, but carried along as the region itself moves, conventional relativistic effects such as time dilation do not apply in the way they would in the case of a ship moving at high velocity through flat spacetime. Also, this method of travel does not actually involve moving faster than light in a local sense, since a light beam within the bubble would still always move faster than the ship; it is only "faster than light" in the sense that, thanks to the contraction of the space in front of it, the ship could reach its destination faster than a light beam restricted to travelling outside the warp bubble. Thus, the Alcubierre drive does not contradict the conventional claim that relativity forbids a slower-than-light object to accelerate to faster-than-light speeds. However, there are no known methods to create such a warp bubble in a region that does not already contain one, or to leave the bubble once inside it, so the Alcubierre drive remains a theoretical concept at this time.
Post by
225644
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
TheMediator
Laihendi isn't solely responsible for any thread being locked unless it's one he made himself, and even then sometimes he isn't solely responsible (if at all).
Uhh... no. You're a troll and you $%^& people off to lock good threads.
Laihendi says something... and a bunch of people go "omg u can't say that" and then some big argument starts out (consisting of more people than just Laihendi, mind you) and then the thread gets locked.
On topic:
In 1994, the Mexican physicist Miguel Alcubierre proposed a method of stretching space in a wave which would in theory cause the fabric of space ahead of a spacecraft to contract and the space behind it to expand. The ship would ride this wave inside a region known as a warp bubble of flat space. Since the ship is not moving within this bubble, but carried along as the region itself moves, conventional relativistic effects such as time dilation do not apply in the way they would in the case of a ship moving at high velocity through flat spacetime. Also, this method of travel does not actually involve moving faster than light in a local sense, since a light beam within the bubble would still always move faster than the ship; it is only "faster than light" in the sense that, thanks to the contraction of the space in front of it, the ship could reach its destination faster than a light beam restricted to travelling outside the warp bubble. Thus, the Alcubierre drive does not contradict the conventional claim that relativity forbids a slower-than-light object to accelerate to faster-than-light speeds. However, there are no known methods to create such a warp bubble in a region that does not already contain one, or to leave the bubble once inside it, so the Alcubierre drive remains a theoretical concept at this time.
No... you're like -
lol you guys are dumb abortion is da bombslice! &*!@ you mytie!
and then you kept trolling em until the thread was locked.
Also, that warp bubble is retarded, its no different than the whole "you can't move faster than the speed of light unless you already are"
Post by
Sagramor
OVER THERE!
AT THE RECYCLE BIN!
GO THERE!
Post by
225644
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Laihendi
No... you're like - lol you guys are dumb abortion is da bombslice! &*!@ you mytie! and then you kept trolling em until the thread was locked.
Also, that warp bubble is retarded, its no different than the whole "you can't move faster than the speed of light unless you already are"
1. Laihendi said that he disagrees with abortion except for during extreme circumstances. And he used no obscenities, or any stupid phrases like "da dombslice".
2. People used to say that continents moving was retarded.
Post by
345133
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
57943
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
284947
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
ASHelmy
WE can already see back in time, so if you could get there before the light left you would theoretically be back in time.
And how would you travel faster then said light?
People dont realize that when we look at the sun or stars we are seeing the past, as the time it takes for the light from the sun or stars to get to us means that we are seeing what those looked like around 10 mins ago.
On a more serious note, Einstein said that the universe was a sphere and if we could send a beam of light around the curve and all the way back to us we would see ourselves in the past. If we could then transform our body into light particles, we could then send our body over that same light beam and travel as it were back in time. The only problem we have with transforming someone into light particles is that we have no way of reassembling those particles.
I do realize that.
Post by
57943
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
ASHelmy
And how would you travel faster then said light?
I would increase my speed until it was higher than the speed of light, but I don't know in what vehicle yet.
You can't, for reasons I don't quite understand, to be honest.
Post by
223674
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
172996
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
TheMediator
And how would you travel faster then said light?
I would increase my speed until it was higher than the speed of light, but I don't know in what vehicle yet.
You can't, for reasons I don't quite understand, to be honest.
Basically I think its like diminishing returns on speed, and light speed is directly on the speed cap since it weighs nothing (or something like that). I think the only way you can beat light somewhere is if you could fold space, AKA teleport.
Plenty of threads have been locked because of you Mediator..... You can't always blame everything on Lahendi or MyTie. You instigate your share of drama for reasons we can only guess at......
I'll admit that's true, however I don't deny it when I get a thread locked. Laihendi is full of it if he believes the abortion thread wasn't locked because of him.
Post by
Interest
Grandfather Paradox
Thats why it isn't possible.
Really, this says it all.
Post Reply
You are not logged in. Please
log in
to post a reply or
register
if you don't already have an account.