This site makes extensive use of JavaScript.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser.
Live
PTR
10.2.7
PTR
10.2.6
Beta
Drop by and say hi! (Recycle Bin)
Post Reply
Return to board index
Post by
260787
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Hyperspacerebel
That's a lot of per's.
A
per
a day keeps the sophist away.
Post by
Sagramor
Geez....sometime you get so into writing that you forget to end your sentences -_-
If, on the other hand, the object is not naturally ordered to the end, then we will know that we have a complex act, that is to say, we are dealing with a case wherein one simple act with its own
per se
ordering of object to end is itself
per accidens
further ordered to another simple act with its
per se
ordering of object to end: as a simple moral act of theft (with
per se
ordering of action ordered to stealing) may
per accidens
, in the mind of the agent, be further ordered to the end of the simple moral act of fornication (with its
per se
ordering of actions that by nature are fornicative), such that we may speak of the first act of being like an object, and the second of being like an end.
PS +cookies to anyone who has any idea that means.
Pretentious bull%^&* much?
Also, I have lots of ideas that mean things. So...where all the cookies at?
Post by
Interest
grrrrr
ROAR
Post by
Hyperspacerebel
Pretentious bull%^&* much?
Mixing big words and swearwords together always makes you look smarter than the guy you are replying to.
/fail
All it's doing is defining what is meant by the phrase 'species of an act.'
Post by
HiVolt
Pretentious bull%^&* much?
Mixing big words and swearwords together always makes you look smarter than the guy you are replying to.
Yes. Yes it does.
Post by
Hyperspacerebel
Yes. Yes it does.
&*!@ing floccinaucinihilipilification.
Post by
Sagramor
Pretentious bull%^&* much?
Mixing big words and swearwords together always makes you look smarter than the guy you are replying to.
/fail
No, but putting lots of would be fancy words and a thousand freaking '
per se
's in a text when they're absolutely not necessary makes you look pretentious. And there's never a reason
not
to say 'bull#$%^'.
Also, I still do not see any cookies.
Post by
Hyperspacerebel
Pretentious bull%^&* much?
Mixing big words and swearwords together always makes you look smarter than the guy you are replying to.
/fail
No, but putting lots of would be fancy words and a thousand freaking '
per se
's in a text when they're absolutely not necessary makes you look pretentious. And there's never a reason
not
to say 'bull#$%^'.
Also, I still do not see any cookies.
Because you don't deserve them. And you obviously don't understand the sentence if you think the per se and per accendes' don't belong.
And they aren't fancy words. I use every single one of those words (except maybe fornication and fornicative) 20+ times every day.
It's called technical jargon. That's how professional philosophers talk.
Post by
Sagramor
Pretentious bull%^&* much?
Mixing big words and swearwords together always makes you look smarter than the guy you are replying to.
/fail
No, but putting lots of would be fancy words and a thousand freaking '
per se
's in a text when they're absolutely not necessary makes you look pretentious. And there's never a reason
not
to say 'bull#$%^'.
Also, I still do not see any cookies.
Because you don't deserve them. And you obviously don't understand the sentence if you think the per se and per accendes' don't belong.
Never said they didn't belong, just that they weren't necessary. Also, you promised cookies and you aren'tt giving them? That's cold, dude.
Post by
chase123
Romanian President Fail
Post by
Sagramor
And they aren't fancy words. I use every single one of those words (except maybe fornication and fornicative) 20+ times every day.
It's called technical jargon. That's how professional philosophers talk.
Good philosophers are good enough to talk simply, because they don't need to make it seem they're mean more than they actually do.
Post by
Laihendi
So Laihendi got in trouble today...
Post by
Interest
So Laihendi got in trouble today...
Was it tuba-related?
Post by
Kristopher
Not according to what he's saying on P:C
Post by
Hyperspacerebel
And they aren't fancy words. I use every single one of those words (except maybe fornication and fornicative) 20+ times every day.
It's called technical jargon. That's how professional philosophers talk.
Good philosophers are good enough to talk simply, because they don't need to make it seem they're mean more than they actually do.
Honestly, you're the one acting pretentious.
Specific terminology is used for a reason. I fit into that one sentence what would have taken several paragraphs to say without the jargon. I didn't write the sentence for your enjoyment. I wrote it to convey knowledge to my peers in the philosophical arena.
And yes, every single
per se
was necessary.
Post by
Sagramor
I wrote it to convey knowledge to my peers in the philosophical arena.
The simple fact that you're writing philosophy
exclusively for philosophers
just makes me want to say;
Sure, let's go with your way. You're right. You've always been. You're a good boy, and a good person. You're like Jimmy-^&*!ing-Neutron. Just brilliant! I wonder how I didn't see it earlier. I am so,
so
sorry. Please forgive me. My simple mind just can't grasp your genius. Wow. Just...seriously...
wow
. You make me rethink my entire life. You have my standing ovations.
Post by
229054
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Laihendi
So Laihendi got in trouble today...
Was it tuba-related?
No.
Post by
Interest
So what was it then?
Post Reply
You are not logged in. Please
log in
to post a reply or
register
if you don't already have an account.