This site makes extensive use of JavaScript.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser.
Live
PTR
10.2.7
PTR
10.2.6
Beta
Women strip for 'Go Topless Day'
Post Reply
Return to board index
Post by
Adamsm
And it still makes no sense; you attempted to combine that fact that fashion of the day was woman(and men) covered up, but because they had large families that somehow makes them 'looser' then people now a days...which didn't make a lot of sense, since the large family was a way to make sure the family name was passed down in a world where, what we now see as basic illnesses, could kill with regularity.
Post by
Atik
It's little different to the way that women are dressed (in principle) in Saudi Arabia.
Are you saying you want to revert our women to that state?
I worked with serveral international employees from Saudi Arabia and similiar areas at the great escape last summer. The girls made it very clear they enjoyed the freedom being here offered them, telling me and fellow american workers several times in out-of-work get-togethers that they enjoyed dressing so freely.
Post by
Adamsm
Actually, that was in response to your comment about Victorian Women there Atik.....
Post by
Atik
I know that, but the way he said it, coupled with him wanting people to tighten up, made it sound like that is what he wants.
Post by
Jubilee
I know that, but the way he said it, coupled with him wanting people to tighten up, made it sound like that is what he wants.
I don't think what he wants is really the point. He's just pointing out that the majority of people in our society would favor chest coverings for women.
Post by
Adamsm
Not really.
Post by
Atik
I know that, but the way he said it, coupled with him wanting people to tighten up, made it sound like that is what he wants.
I don't think what he wants is really the point. He's just pointing out that the majority of people in our society would favor chest coverings for women.
So why do we need laws enforcing it?
I mean, why not juust let the people who want to be topless go topless if the majority will still wear tops?
Post by
Adamsm
Nudity taboo kicking in.
Post by
Squishalot
No, the point is that it's not 'pretty crazy'. Argument
ad hominem
aren't valid arguments.
Neither is "they enjoy not having to follow the rules", because there are a lot of rules (speeding, smoking pot, etc.) that many people would enjoy not having to follow.
You haven't come up with a valid argument yet.
Post by
Jubilee
So why do we need laws enforcing it?
I mean, why not juust let the people who want to be topless go topless if the majority will still wear tops?
It's the public spectacle that is the issue.
Not really.
If you think he's saying something different, you're free to say what that is. "Not really" isn't very helpful.
Post by
Atik
No, the point is that it's not 'pretty crazy'. Argument
ad hominem
aren't valid arguments.
Are you calling it sane what happens if those women expose even their faces?
Post by
Adamsm
Not really.
If you think he's saying something different, you're free to say what that is. "Not really" isn't very helpful.
/shrug
Though, a lot of this did get discussed in a similar thread.
No, the point is that it's not 'pretty crazy'. Argument
ad hominem
aren't valid arguments.
Are you calling it sane what happens if those women expose even their faces?
Do you think it's fair that a woman who goes topless in the US, depending on the state, can end up being charged as a sexual predator just for flashing some titties?
Post by
Squishalot
He's just pointing out that the majority of people in our society would favor chest coverings for women.
And men. Don't forget that! I don't particularly want specimens like
this
wandering around uncovered on the street.
No, the point is that it's not 'pretty crazy'. Argument
ad hominem
aren't valid arguments.
Are you calling it sane what happens if those women expose even their faces?
It is sane, it's justified in a logical (if not free) manner. Again, argument
ad hominem
.(##RESPBREAK##)8##DELIM##Squishalot##DELIM##
Post by
Atik
Do you think it's fair that a woman who goes topless in the US, depending on the state, can end up being charged as a sexual predator just for flashing some titties?
No, which is why I'm against the laws.
If they start taking their pants off, it gets wierd.
Post by
Adamsm
I don't particularly want specimens like
this
wandering around uncovered on the street.
Sadly, we have older gentlemen who go around like that.....and the quote from Red Green still comes to mind: Guys! Put on your shirts! Your grossing out the woman, freaking out the children, and confusing the babies!
Post by
Squishalot
Do you think it's fair that a woman who goes topless in the US, depending on the state, can end up being charged as a sexual predator just for flashing some titties?
How is it different, flashing titties or flashing pussy? (With sexual intent, mind you)(##RESPBREAK##)8##DELIM##Squishalot##DELIM##
Post by
Atik
Do you think it's fair that a woman who goes topless in the US, depending on the state, can end up being charged as a sexual predator just for flashing some titties?
How is it different, flashing titties or flashing pussy? (With sexual intent, mind you)
With sexual intent? It isn't by much, aside from how shocking one can be in appearance compared to the other.
But most women who want to go topless aren't after that... I hope...
Post by
Adamsm
Do you think it's fair that a woman who goes topless in the US, depending on the state, can end up being charged as a sexual predator just for flashing some titties?
How is it different, flashing titties or flashing pussy? (With sexual intent, mind you)
I'm honestly not sure how an indecent exposure charge can get trumped up into a charge for sexual predator....as I'm not sure how a woman who walks around without a shirt and a bra just in a normal day is 'out hunting' and all.
Edit: In other words, just for not having a shirt, they get the same treatment as a flasher(aka male who exposes his genitals at a woman/young girls/children whatever), which is really ridiculous.
Post by
Squishalot
I'm honestly not sure how an indecent exposure charge can get trumped up into a charge for sexual predator....as I'm not sure how a woman who walks around without a shirt and a bra just in a normal day is 'out hunting' and all.
Ah, I see what you mean now. In that case, that's not an issue with the indecent exposure laws.
With sexual intent? It isn't by much, aside from how shocking one can be in appearance compared to the other.
But most women who want to go topless aren't after that... I hope...
See above. What makes breasts different from a vagina? Why should one be restricted from being 'free' and not the other?
Post by
Atik
Because a vagina is used for mating.
Breasts are used for feeding young.
They are completely different body parts.
Post Reply
You are not logged in. Please
log in
to post a reply or
register
if you don't already have an account.