This site makes extensive use of JavaScript.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser.
Live
PTR
10.2.7
PTR
10.2.6
Beta
Old Tree Form vs New Tree Form
Post Reply
Return to board index
Post by
Sweetscot
In my opinion they could just split it into two spells with a glyph or something. there would be a 'vanity' tree form, where you can just run around as a tree, old model, and then the actual throughput spell that buffs you and changes your model into the new form. Hell, the 'vanity' form doesn't need to have any buffs or restrictions, it can just
be
there, so resto doesn't feel left out of the shapeshift game.
This is what I want, people can go "loljustagraphic" all day long but the fact that plenty of people were used to and LIKED the treant form and having it yanked really upset them. Yes it wasn't around in vanilla, doesn't mean people hadn't been playing with it for years and loved it. Also, this argument IS still very valid because people have said "lets do this to moonkins too" so if you/we liked old treeform, like permanent shapeshifts, etc we do still need to be crying about this 7 months later so that moonkins who like their moonkin form don't get dealt the same card. IMO if you have a moonkin and you don't want to look like a moonkin, respec or reroll. Play a dang mage because if you want to play a boomie without its shapeshift thats what you want to be.
As to new form vs old form as a graphic..TREANT RULES! I could tolerate broccoli-head if it was just the oh-shi cd to evolve yourself.
Just give us a way to turn back to a treant please pleeeeeease, I didn't roll any of my multiple druids to run around in caster-form, I have a priest and pally if I want to heal in caster form.
Post Reply
You are not logged in. Please
log in
to post a reply or
register
if you don't already have an account.