This site makes extensive use of JavaScript.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser.
Live
PTR
10.2.7
PTR
10.2.6
Beta
Ret - Should there be a gap?
Post Reply
Return to board index
Post by
798628
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
581897
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
565756
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
353990
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Monday
Definite yes to HW: it doesn't hit very hard, but its cheap, works as a good filler, and can generate holy power thanks to divine purpose.
It doesn't generate Holy Power per se, more acts as mastery did before. Also, it most definitely isn't cheap, but hits for a fair amount.
Post by
353990
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
322291
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
798628
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
dslg604t
Thanks for all the quick and helpful replies, though I think i'll need to juggle my action bars/key bindings as HW and cons are a bit to far down the keyboard :)
Someone mentioned DS, i dont recall ever using this since I was on wrath ages ago. I assume against less than 4 targets this will still be bottom of the pile even after the patch (assuming I'm remembering the notes correctly)?
#showtooltip
/castsequence reset=14 Holy Wrath, Consecration
/startattack
That macro will cast HW if it's off cooldown, or Consecration if it's on CD. So basically it's your last to press button if everything else if on cooldown.
DS should never be used single target. Post 4.1, it generates HP if it hits more than 4 targets, but at the moment, i'm skeptical (spelling?) of it's usage. As a rough guideline, only use it if there are 5 or more targets.
TL;DR:
Replace HW+Cons with the macro.
DS is for 5+ mobs.
Sorry, it's not really a TL;DR, it's just that I realised it's a bit hard to understand. I'm feeling a tad tired.
Post by
Azazel
Get clcret. Seriously, you don't even have to think.
Post by
pezz
i'm skeptical (spelling?) of it's usage
Actually you spelled skeptical correctly but incorrectly put an apostrophe in its! It's annoying when you're looking on the wrong place and a different mistake sneaks up on you.
Post Reply
You are not logged in. Please
log in
to post a reply or
register
if you don't already have an account.