This site makes extensive use of JavaScript.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser.
Live
PTR
10.2.7
PTR
10.2.6
Blizz has had some bad ideas in the past...
Post Reply
Return to board index
Post by
Zoneseek
...but Tol Barad easily tops them.
Post by
Azazel
kthxbai
Post by
Treskol
This thread is informative and original.
Post by
tuckmuck203
This thread is informative and original.
I am impressed by the OP's insightfulness, and descriptiveness. OP, are you alobbyist? Your argument really sways my oppinion
Post by
hawke
He's right tho. Tol Barad is probably the worst PvP Blizzard have implemented so far.
It's damn close to be near impossible to win back if you're the attacker. You need to control all flag at once. The Defending faction just need to zerg a flag, and since your force are reduced to defending 3 flags, they're zerg is guaranteed to take at least one flag everytime they move... wich make it almost impossible to hold 3 flags.
Attacker are actually at a disadvantage there, and it shouldn't be. It should be a 50% chance for D and O to take back / defend Tol Barad, but it's far from there.
Post by
493945
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post Reply
You are not logged in. Please
log in
to post a reply or
register
if you don't already have an account.
