This site makes extensive use of JavaScript.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser.
Live
PTR
10.2.7
PTR
10.2.6
Beta
How DOES Blizzard justify it?
Return to board index
Post by
MrSCH
My only annoyance is that you keep double-posting. Calm down, it isn't a chat room. Just edit stuff in; we'll get to you in an hour or two. :P
I meant to edit that one in o.0
Post by
Azazel
Why don't most of you take advice from Monjaru's sig, become monks, and let this thread die.
I'm atheist.
Post by
Monjaru
My sig actually say to become a "mime", not a "monk". As far as I know, monks still talk; mimes don't.
Post by
682479
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
TheMediator
Guild wars lower level PvP was fairly balanced, but then again, they designed the game with PvP in mind. In WoW, leveling is meant to just be "fun" for most characters, and for some classes they wouldn't be "fun" leveling if they didn't end up overpowered in PvP just because of the design of the class.
Post by
MrSCH
Would it just be easier if I said I was a little crying who has no skill and QQs because I can't play any class ever?
Because if so, it's the case, screw it. I have plenty of sucess in real life to not particularly care about the game when I think about it. My frustration was evident on my initial post but don't think I'm always like that. For example today, went on my level 80 warrior and had SO MUCH FUN! Has crap PvE gear, no PvP gear and I was Charge > Shield Slam > Dead from a couple of massive crits and loved it! Hell, A Lock dotted me up when I was in the GY and I died. From dots alone... and I thought it was funny heh.
Post by
Synectics
I have plenty of sucess in real life to not particularly care about the game when I think about it.
I have a feeling I've heard this one before.
Post by
MrSCH
I have plenty of sucess in real life to not particularly care about the game when I think about it.
I have a feeling I've heard this one before.
That's because 99% of the people on this forum do, not because I'm a special snowflake.
prick.
Post by
Monjaru
That's because 99% of the people on this forum do, not because I'm a special snowflake.
prick.
When you feel the need to tell us, under the guise of musing glorious revelations about life to yourself, people are bound to be skeptical.
No need to get hostile (again).
Post by
MrSCH
That's because 99% of the people on this forum do, not because I'm a special snowflake.
prick.
When you feel the need to tell us, under the guise of musing glorious revelations about life to yourself, people are bound to be skeptical.
No need to get hostile (again).
I get hostile when people are !@#$s. Be that through actual hostility themselves or an unnecessarily sarcastic/'douché' tone. If people are civil, I don't get 'hostile' and it really is that simple.
Post by
Synectics
That's because 99% of the people on this forum do, not because I'm a special snowflake.
prick.
Just saying. Anyone using the argument, "I don't care, I'm not a geek, I have a real life!" ...while using an unofficial discussion board to discuss one of the most geeky genres of video games....
It's like saying you have a life while standing at a comic-con. You're just trying to make yourself sound better than -- and therefore belittle -- everyone else, when in truth there's nothing wrong with enjoying and fervently discussing the hobby in the first place.
EDIT: I KNOW YOU ARE BUT WHAT AM I.
Post by
255458
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Synectics
Not really sure what you're getting at, that heirlooms are broken, or that melee are somehow better with heirlooms... which is certainly not the case.
I'm not too sure how it is now, but I know casters didn't really get much benefit from heirlooms outside of being able to enchant the chest piece for extra mana and the staff with intellect. It used to basically mean a lot less downtime with the bigger mana pool, but you didn't really hit harder.
So at the time, melee definitely got a lot more benefit from, say, dual weapons with dual Crusader enchants than casters did from a bigger mana pool. :P
Post by
255458
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
354743
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Synectics
Heirlooms do shockingly little for survivability in a bracket where peoples lives are measured in seconds of combat.
True story. Even without heirlooms, low-level brackets have increasingly become more like WotLK's end-game PvP was -- burst, burst, burst.
Post by
682479
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
XxOmuraxX
Only level 85 is supposed to be balanced in pvp.
I know ambush hurt a lot in low level brackets with heirloom gears (19-29-39-49-59-69-79) xD
But eh, rogue are still so dependent of stealth that they are not getting as much kills as they should.
Hunters has always been really strong as twink, even before heirloom has been available.
Rogues are usually strong while soloing but they are weaker in teamfights if everyone is in combat (due to combo points system and no sap) so stay in group or go invis too (dont forget you're a drood).
Melee classes own ranged classes in melee range, nothing abnormal, so stay far from them.
If you know a rogue is going to attack you, you should have your 3 lifeblooms on you and cd ready.
Casters are known to not be the easier to play twinks in bg.
Post by
Treskol
Rogues are usually strong while soloing but they are weaker in teamfights if everyone is in combat (
due to combo points
system and no sap) so stay in group or go invis too (dont forget you're a drood).
Are you talking about if the rogue is out off stealth aswell?
Cause if thats the case, then thats true. But it's less true if that rogue is Combat or Assassination than Sub cause of the special move for the tree. Infact a Combat rogue would thrive in a huge group because off
Blade Flurry
If the rogue is still in stealth, then they will still use their normal opener.
As for the bolded bit, im not quite sure what you are getting at here. Are you saying that rogues generate energy too slow? Goshad will probably correct me on this, but energy is generated at 20/s, which is more than enough too compete. If anything, the reason a rogue doesn't hold his own in a group is because of the lack off AoE.
Post by
atomicwolf22
Driuds can only prowl out of combat. So as long as there is combat they can't stealth.
Also driuds don't learn Lifebloom till level 64 I just learned it on mine.
Now for the rogues aren't good in group fights vs. 1 on 1 that may be true. But only in groups of 3 or more, a person the knows how to play there rogue will very easily kill 2 people with no problems. Specially if there willing to use a cd.
Post Reply
This topic is locked. You cannot post a reply.