This site makes extensive use of JavaScript.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser.
Live
PTR
10.2.7
PTR
10.2.6
Beta
Did i really deserve to get guild kick?
Return to board index
Post by
Davidson
So I guess being a wowhead patron or whatever makes it so that you're not wrong. And if people disagree with you, you can just accuse them of not reading your posts.
Where can I sign up?
top right,press character profile and pay. Except from being rude you also don't get adds and don't have a captcha,all in 1 packet!
My god, "No captcha (the little "enter the code in the box" thing)" is worth the $9.99 by itself.
Post by
Davidson
Pages 3 and 4 say you're wrong.
You're acting like a spoiled kid, who puts his hand over his ears so he can't here anything and therefore doesn't have to respond.
Pot...meet Kettle...
Post by
Braevia
No, you didn't. You're just stalling for time because you have no argument.
Pages 3 and 4 say you're wrong.
You're acting like a spoiled kid, who puts his hand over his ears so he can't here anything and therefore doesn't have to respond.
Is english your second language? Did you write those posts in some kind of invisible text? Because you're claiming to have written something that I just don't see there. Is it just that hard for you to admit to being wrong? It's alright. Just stop "arguing" without making a point, and I'll pretend that you never started.
Post by
Hyperspacerebel
Is english your second language? Did you write those posts in some kind of invisible text? Because you're claiming to have written something that I just don't see there. Is it just that hard for you to admit to being wrong? It's alright. Just stop "arguing" without making a point, and I'll pretend that you never started.
My God, you really are something, aren't you...
I've got 6 posts on those two pages. Don't tell me you can't see them, because everyone else on this board can.
Post by
Braevia
Is english your second language? Did you write those posts in some kind of invisible text? Because you're claiming to have written something that I just don't see there. Is it just that hard for you to admit to being wrong? It's alright. Just stop "arguing" without making a point, and I'll pretend that you never started.
My God, you really are something, aren't you...
I've got 6 posts on those two pages. Don't tell me you can't see them, because everyone else on this board can.
I see them, they just don't say what you claim they do. You're still wrong.
Post by
SirPunky
Because everyone else on this board can.
All I see is 2 anonymous people trying to flex some retarded e-peen over an uninteresting debate.
Post by
Hyperspacerebel
I see them, they just don't say what you claim they do. You're still wrong.
I gave reasons for such a rule. You choosing not to see that I gave them is not a valid means of argument, and you know it. So, you can either continue to ignore them and leave, because there is no reason for you to continue arguing against something that "doesn't exist"; or you can man-up, respond to the arguments, and maybe move this thread along.
Because everyone else on this board can.
All I see is 2 anonymous people trying to flex some retarded e-peen over an uninteresting debate.
And I see a third person come in to show how he's better than the first two because he's not participating. Oh, too late...he just participated.
Post by
SirPunky
And I see a third person come in to show how he's better than the first two
because he's not participating. Oh, too late...he just participated.
And now that I participated, your e-peen is bigger?
Post by
Braevia
I see them, they just don't say what you claim they do. You're still wrong.
I gave reasons for such a rule. You choosing not to see that I gave them is not a valid means of argument, and you know it. So, you can either continue to ignore them and leave, because there is no reason for you to continue arguing against something that "doesn't exist"; or you can man-up, respond to the arguments, and maybe move this thread along.
Because everyone else on this board can.
All I see is 2 anonymous people trying to flex some retarded e-peen over an uninteresting debate.
And I see a third person come in to show how he's better than the first two because he's not participating. Oh, too late...he just participated.
You cannot simply declare your reasons to be valid. Again, I must say that I find your claims of of an academic background in philosophy to be suspect.
Post by
375923
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Davidson
You cannot simply declare your reasons to be valid. Again, I must say that I find your claims of of an academic background in philosophy to be suspect.
Dude, lay off, he's a wow head patron. As he stated, If he says he's right, then he is right.
Post by
Hyperspacerebel
And I see a third person come in to show how he's better than the first two
because he's not participating. Oh, too late...he just participated.
And now that I participated, your e-peen is bigger?
No, now yours shrunk down to our size.
You cannot simply declare your reasons to be valid. Again, I must say that I find your claims of of an academic background in philosophy to be suspect.
Haha, very funny. You need to stop acting like a child.
Now, I can declare whatever I want. That was a declaration is. You job, if you disagree, is to provide a counter-argument as to why my reasons are not valid. That's something you refuse to do.
Dude, lay off, he's a wow head patron. As he stated, If he says he's right, then he is right.
I'll bet you can't find a single quote of mine verifying what you just claimed I said.
I thought not.
Grow up people.
Post by
150529
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Davidson
You cannot simply declare your reasons to be valid. Again, I must say that I find your claims of of an academic background in philosophy to be suspect.
Dude, lay off, he's a wow head patron. As he stated, If he says he's right, then he is right.
rule n1 of trolls: don't be so obvious
If I was a troll...rule n1 of dealing with them is to ignore.
So, either I'm not and you're right, or I am and you're wrong.
Post by
Braevia
And I see a third person come in to show how he's better than the first two
because he's not participating. Oh, too late...he just participated.
And now that I participated, your e-peen is bigger?
No, now yours shrunk down to our size.
You cannot simply declare your reasons to be valid. Again, I must say that I find your claims of of an academic background in philosophy to be suspect.
Haha, very funny. You need to stop acting like a child.
Now, I can declare whatever I want. That was a declaration is. You job, if you disagree, is to provide a counter-argument as to why my reasons are not valid. That's something you refuse to do.
Dude, lay off, he's a wow head patron. As he stated, If he says he's right, then he is right.
I'll bet you can't find a single quote of mine verifying what you just claimed I said.
I thought not.
Grow up people.
So you have no responsibility to provide a compelling argument for your declarations, yet you expect me to conjure up a counter-argument to your non-existent evidence?
Again, are you sure that you went to a college-level institution? Or was this some kind of philosophy trade school? Did you only attend classes online?
Post by
Erethzium
Nerd fights on the internet are fun to watch.
/cast Popcorn (Rank 2)
Post by
Hyperspacerebel
So you have no responsibility to provide a compelling argument for your declarations, yet you expect me to conjure up a counter-argument to your non-existent evidence?
Let's start with the basics, so you don's have to make a fool of yourself any longer.
Do you know what "a reason" is? It's the premise of an argument.
So when someone asks the reason why X is so, they're asking for the premises supporting it.
Premises themselves are assumed to be true, otherwise you couldn't have a starting point. That is not to say they cannot be challenged. Challenging a premise involves using different premises to come to a conclusion that contradicts the original premise, and thus cast into doubt the original conclusion.
So, your job would be to use applicable premises to demonstrate that the reasons I gave are in fact not valid. Until, you or someone else challenges them in such a way, they stand as correct.
Again, are you sure that you went to a college-level institution? Or was this some kind of philosophy trade school? Did you only attend classes online?
Really?
Really?
I'll say it again. Grow up.
Post by
Monday
I'm going to agree with HSR here... Braevia you keep just dodging the question and ignoring it. I don't see why he even bothers to argue with you anymore.
Post by
Braevia
So you have no responsibility to provide a compelling argument for your declarations, yet you expect me to conjure up a counter-argument to your non-existent evidence?
Let's start with the basics, so you don's have to make a fool of yourself any longer.
Do you know what "a reason" is? It's the premise of an argument.
So when someone asks the reason why X is so, they're asking for the premises supporting it.
Premises themselves are assumed to be true, otherwise you couldn't have a starting point. That is not to say they cannot be challenged. Challenging a premise involves using different premises to come to a conclusion that contradicts the original premise, and thus cast into doubt the original conclusion.
So, your job would be to use applicable premises to demonstrate that the reasons I gave are in fact not valid. Until, you or someone else challenges them in such a way, they stand as correct.
Again, are you sure that you went to a college-level institution? Or was this some kind of philosophy trade school? Did you only attend classes online?
Really?
Really?
I'll say it again. Grow up.
I gave my reasons already. You have ignored them. Perhaps you should take your own advice and read the thread?
Post by
Rubendesmet619
I agree it was wrong to kick him right on the spot, I agree it is a stupid rule by itself
BUT
Rules are rules and you agreed with them. If you don't wanne follow a guild's rules don't join it.
Post Reply
This topic is locked. You cannot post a reply.