This site makes extensive use of JavaScript.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser.
Live
PTR
10.2.5
PTR
10.2.6
General Lore Discussions
Post Reply
Return to board index
Post by
Rankkor
And until the end of Day of the Dragon, most don't realize that Prestor was him.
and even after it "some" people still didn't knew.
After all, Onyxia had Varian dancing cumbaya on her lap while under the guise of Katrana Prestor. And nobody batted an eye on her direction.
Post by
870547
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Adamsm
Again. The way things are currently written and given how the horde player base is, we don't need Varian. You however *need* Garrosh. Without Garrosh you have to fess up to being led by an insane, war mongering moron. Without Garrosh, the Alliance can't play the victim. :(Wait....what? Really?
Edit: Considering how badly the Horde player base treat Garrosh, you are going that way eh?
Yeah, things he saw in the undercity that Thrall was currently taking care of. My point stands. Now I know you're smart enough to know that WoW is set in fairly medieval times. Don't dumb yourself down just to try to win a debate.Again...what? The Fourth War started at that point....you know, when Varian declares his war on the Horde; it really doesn't matter if Thrall was killing Vari at that point, since the Alliance forces were mopping up the renegade RAS....but since Sylvanas keeps using the Blight in Cata anyways well, that didn't do much did it?
Looks like even wowhead patrons are capable of flame bating.What can I say, you bring out the worst in people; how many times have you received warnings from the mods/admins now?
Post by
870547
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Adamsm
The alliance have a false sense of self righteousness. Without a bad guy, they're the bad guy. They can't handle that.Uh huh; I'd almost believe that comment....except there is no bad guy in either faction: There are bad commanders, and people who do things that are grossly repulsive, but beyond that, it's still a gray vs gray game.
It doesn't matter to you because you're irrationally biased towards the Alliance.According to who exactly? I mean really, you don't actually frequent this forum very often; I have no bias towards either group. I do have a massive bias against Sylvanas, as anyone here on the forum can tell you, but beyond that, I like all but the Forsaken on Horde side. Really, should do some research; this is the 3rd or 4th time you've said this ridiculous comment, and you have been corrected on it from other users then just me.
So, me having a friendly debate is making you troll?
Oh, I think the times I've been warned by admins is around 5-6, probably more. That doesn't change the fact that you're trolling. I'll ask you kindly to stick to the actual lore topic at hand. Lets be adults about this.As I said, you bring out the worst in posters; and dude, you aren't sticking to them, or being adult about it.
Post by
870547
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Adamsm
Now you're contradicting yourself, it's pretty obvious. "there are no bad guys, just guys who do bad things"And declaring one entire faction as 'bad' is a really dumb idea.
Anyone who can objectively read what people post? You don't need to read too deeply to see that you despise a former Horde character being highlighted in an expansion even though you are completely fine with how Wrath was handled.Not really; I enjoyed the Wrathgate, but I hated the actual ending of the expansion: That whole 'there must always be a Lich King' is the biggest and most moronic ass pull done by Blizzard and I would have been much happier had it made ICC the second last dungeon and Ulduar was the actual finale. I didn't like the War added into the game after the events of the Wrathgate(please, tell me where I've said that); however, does that mean we are suddenly on the Fifth War? No, since Blizzard has said it's still the Fourth War, which exploded in Cata and is going to go nuclear in MoP.
Edit: Of course, you leave out the part where other posters on the forum have told you I have no bias, but hey, whatever makes you feel better about yourself in regards to posting!
Well I'll be the bigger man and just end this. You're enjoying the derailment of the conversation a bit too much and I just do not want to further sully the story forum with the kind of pettiness you're perpetrating right now.Fine by me, since other then saying I have an Alliance Bias, you haven't really said much here, other then just bashing a faction wholesale.
Post by
588688
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Rankkor
Broksar, insulting the person you are "debating" with is not a "friendly debate".
=/ not to spark any conflicts but I find it funny YOU say that considering your behavior on the Blood Dk thread you made. Where you called everyone who was disagreeing with you "arrogant, immature, hostile trolls".
Hardly chivalrous behavior on your part (Specially since everyone (myself included) raised several GOOD points to counter your notion that Blood Dks are OP)
Post by
588688
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Rankkor
Broksar, insulting the person you are "debating" with is not a "friendly debate".
=/ not to spark any conflicts but I find it funny YOU say that considering your behavior on the Blood Dk thread you made. Where you called everyone who was disagreeing with you "arrogant, immature, hostile trolls".
Hardly chivalrous behavior on your part (Specially since everyone (myself included) raised several GOOD points to counter your notion that Blood Dks are OP)
Well to be fair the first comments were hostile and unfriendly towards me. At least I ditched the thread instead of participating in a flame war. I was getting called a troll from the get go.
Edit: Oh I responded again to it anyway, glad to see some people agreeing with me. I just wish some of the posters would be more civil.
most of them were civil (Again including myself) you just got upset that so few would agree with that 1sided stance that Blood Dks were OP (which they're not)
Edit: anyhow lets continue this on that thread, this is about lore, not pvp :P (left you a response btw)
Post by
588688
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Adamsm
No, no child of the Emo-King. And even then, the Concubines were a Shivaara(doubt a viable match to a Night Elf) and Blood Elves...but as they are all concubines, getting pregnant was always a bad idea.
Edit: Of course....who really cares if Illidan didn't get his V-Card punched?
Post by
588688
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Rankkor
secret love-child
this is the number 1 clishe of soap operas and its one sure way to tell that a story has jumped the shark for good.
if blizz EVER adds a new character, regardless of who she or he is, via the "secret love-child" card, then the doomsayers yelling that wow is dieing will have a fair point.
Post by
588688
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Adamsm
Who hasn't shown up in the actual game.
Post by
588688
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Rankkor
Who hasn't shown up in the actual game.
And hopefully never will.
Amen
Post by
588688
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post Reply
You are not logged in. Please
log in
to post a reply or
register
if you don't already have an account.