This site makes extensive use of JavaScript.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser.
Live
PTR
10.2.7
PTR
10.2.6
Beta
News Articles
Post Reply
Return to board index
Post by
MyTie
Foxxy Noxy
... Did she or didn't she?
Post by
165617
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
MyTie
I wonder how many other people will be robbing them in the future. I suspect, not many.
Post by
Skyfire
Read the last few pages. Read the RB from last night. Read anything that guy has posted in the last 24 hours. He is just following me around, getting my opinion, and then trolling it.
No, from reading the RB, it looks more like you trolled yourself.
If you are going to support that, instead of reasonable discussion of news articles, then I don't know how you can call yourself a moderator. If anyone has been decent in debate lately, it has been me. He is just looking for a bone to pick with me, and it's obvious. I have been very civil. I have bent over backward to be civil. Even when people outright call me an 'ASS', I let it go. But the moment I tell someone who is trollin me to bug off, you come to their defense.
So I'm the bad guy now? So you weren't really mad about him/them at all? Which is it?
Are you mad at us both? One for calling you out as the person you are on these boards, the other for simply saying "take it," because you are that kind of person?
You are the person who looks for an argument, and posts in a thread about news articles, which are to be discussed/argued. If you are going to post here and in this thread, you are going to need to be able to take whatever whomsoever dishes out, so long as it doesn't move into the "you idiot stage." I honestly don't see anything about his post
whatsoever
that violates the concept of civility. It's in your head. In context.
Which would make this thread your soapbox, because you're the
only
one who takes the opportunity to post news articles. As I said before, if you aren't willing to discuss an article, either a) don't post it, or b) don't expect to be aided when someone calmly asks for your actual opinion and you reply with "no, GTFO."
You need to become more informed about what is going on in the randomness, and become a more effective moderator, in my opinion.
/shrug. IMO, I do my job finely on this particular board.
Post by
MyTie
Are you mad at us both? One for calling you out as the person you are on these boards, the other for simply saying "take it," because you are that kind of person?
Very professional of you.
Post by
Skyfire
Are you mad at us both? One for calling you out as the person you are on these boards, the other for simply saying "take it," because you are that kind of person?
Very professional of you.
How good of you to respond to the whole post.
/sigh
Post by
MyTie
Which would make this thread your soapbox, because you're the
only
one who takes the opportunity to post news articles. As I said before, if you aren't willing to discuss an article, either a) don't post it, or b) don't expect to be aided when someone calmly asks for your actual opinion and you reply with "no, GTFO."
Let's seeeee... hmmm.... I want to discuss news articles on the news articles thread, not examine whether or not my opinion is correct, or even what my opinion is. As with the movie director discussion, the point is to examine his opinions, and implications thereof, not mine. You see, I'm trying to stay on topic.
And, no... I'm not the only one to post news articles here.
Post by
MyTie
Are you mad at us both? One for calling you out as the person you are on these boards, the other for simply saying "take it," because you are that kind of person?
Very professional of you.
How good of you to respond to the whole post.
/sigh
I didn't change the meaning or take you out of context here. Look at what you're saying. You have made me into your little personal vendatta. You're obviously biased.
Anyway, point out a rule I have broken, or expect to get ignored by me. Do your job, or move along.
Post by
374287
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
MyTie
On topic, don't believe Knox had anything to do with the girl's death based on what I've read. But she's American, and cute, so it sells a lot of papers and gets a lot of attention for those involved in the case.My thoughts as well.
Post by
Hyperspacerebel
Oh look! They finally figured out that what makes comedians funny is that they make fun of things.
Post by
MyTie
Oh look! They finally figured out that what makes comedians funny is that they make fun of things.
If they don't like it, they shouldn't watch him. He is free to say those things if he wants.
Post by
374287
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
MyTie
I wouldn't call it funny, or tasteful. I certainly wouldn't watch it, but I'm not going to try to stop the guy. If he wants to make a fool of himself, I say, /shrug.
Post by
MyTie
Here
's an article that discusses Limbaugh's criticisms of Obama. The article is an editorial written by a liberal. Every time the writer is faced with one of Limbaugh's Obama criticisms, she immediately points to Bush's many mistakes.
I've really noticed this trend a lot lately.
Obama can do no wrong
*.
* if in the case Obama does wrong, talk about Bush.
Post by
leonheart87
Oh look! They finally figured out that what makes comedians funny is that they make fun of things.
If they don't like it, they shouldn't watch him. He is free to say those things if he wants.
Am I the only person who has never heard of him and/or his act?
As MyTie seems to be the only one posting articles, I shall have a go!:
X Factor = srs bsns.
So serious, the opinion of the Prime Minister is needed.
Good thing my care mug is empty, hd it not been, I might have cried at how bad things have become.
Breaking News: My keyboard has sticky keys. Update at 10.
Post by
374287
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
MyTie
This
article may not technically be considered news, since it is just a blog, but many of the news stories linked here are editorial.
The writer asks the question "What is a liberal?" then answers it. The writer believes they fit the definition.
Post by
TheMediator
a true liberal is always open to the possibility that his conclusions are wrong and is always receptive to arguments which are grounded in empiricism and concern for justice.
And this is why "liberals" as defined like that are better than "conservatives". If the older ways are proven to be better, then that is fine, but once conservatives stick to their old ways because that's the way they've been, that's when there is trouble.
Post by
374287
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post Reply
You are not logged in. Please
log in
to post a reply or
register
if you don't already have an account.