This site makes extensive use of JavaScript.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser.
Live
PTR
10.2.7
PTR
10.2.6
Beta
Naxxramas, Now and Then
Post Reply
Return to board index
Post by
Jakal
to the point- Why did Blizzard delete the lvl 60 Naxx for the 80, when they could have left it and had both?
I am of the opinion that they could have left the 60 version, and still had the 80.
After all, Garrosh is still in Nagrand, so it is not like 2 of the same thing/person can't exist in different places at the same time.
What is the general opinion on this tho?
Post by
Haxzor
"Lore"
Post by
sammion
in the words of GIR:
"To make room for the Cupcake(s)!"
errr... death knights, not cupcakes.
Post by
382303
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Haxzor
Then we'd have a second, magical Naxxramas, with two Kel'Thuzad's, two separate raids, and lore would be raped. Hard. Wouldn't have surprised me a bit if Blizzard had tried to write in new lore that allowed the old 60 raid to stand.
The current lore is that Arthas moved it closer to him, making them stronger and what not.
Post by
Necrobat
Plus there's the chance of accidental zone-ins to the wrong instance due to them most likely sharing address names and whatnot for server side stuff, and with the old world being legacy coded, it was easier to remove then to even try and rework it.
Post by
Jakal
So after we killed them all at lvl 60 did Arthas rez them and transport them to Northrend?
Post by
buzz3070
like people said it is for lore reasons.
also the reason there are 2 of certain npcs is that if they removed the old world version of them ill use your example of garrosh then they would have to remove the enitre quest line related to him in nagrand. and i dont think blizz wants to do that.
Post Reply
You are not logged in. Please
log in
to post a reply or
register
if you don't already have an account.