此站点大量使用JavaScript。
请在您的浏览器中启用JavaScript。
正式服
PTR
10.2.7
PTR
10.2.6
Beta
Gs Vs. Skill
发表回复
返回主列表
发布者
HoleofArt
Key word there is "usually." 537 is not uncrittable against a raid boss. Against most trash, yes. But not bosses, and that's important. I don't care if 537 defense means something like a .01% chance to be crit, that's still too high as a crit can one shot a tank. So GS better be flagging tanks as under def cap at 537.
Wrong. Most tanks use the stam/resil shoulder enchant and the crit reduction from resilence stacks additively with defense. A tank with 537 defense and the stam/resil shoulder enchant is completely uncrittable in PvE. Gearscore, however, does not register this.
This is one relatively obscure example of how Gearscore's gearing audit fails at gauging a player's skill, and there are many others.
IMO Gearscore should have an update. When you enter ICC, your GS is increased by 30%.
No no no. Your skill is improved by 30%. I thought everyone knew that.
发布者
Liquoid
Key word there is "usually." 537 is not uncrittable against a raid boss. Against most trash, yes. But not bosses, and that's important. I don't care if 537 defense means something like a .01% chance to be crit, that's still too high as a crit can one shot a tank. So GS better be flagging tanks as under def cap at 537.
Wrong. Most tanks use the stam/resil shoulder enchant and the crit reduction from resilence stacks additively with defense. A tank with 537 defense and the stam/resil shoulder enchant is completely uncrittable in PvE. Gearscore, however, does not register this.
This is one relatively obscure example of how Gearscore's gearing audit fails at gauging a player's skill, and there are many others.
IMO Gearscore should have an update. When you enter ICC, your GS is increased by 30%.
No no no. Your skill is improved by 30%. I thought everyone knew that.
That is exactly what I said.
No no no. Your skill is improved by 30%
your GS is increased by 30%.
发布者
HoleofArt
Good point. Sorry, I'm sleepy.
发布者
93865
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
发布者
HoleofArt
So you're saying the entirety of GearScore is completely useless in all situations?
That appears to be what you're insinuating.
It's not what I'm insinuating, it's what I'm arguing.
You're being dishonest in implying that I need to make my point indirectly because it is absurd. Your intent is to back up your position by ridiculing the other party because it's not supported by reason.
Or completely take that out of context. I wasn't trying to ridicule you..
I was genuinely unsure if that's the point you were arguing, as you never said it straight. Therefore, you were insinuating it. Relax. This is just semantics, anyways.
发布者
93865
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
发布者
HoleofArt
The difference between an assertion and an insinuation is not semantic.
The act of arguing about it is semantic.
发布者
160546
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
发布者
534868
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
发表回复
您没有登录。请
登录
发表回复或
注册
如果您还没有账号。