Diese Seite macht ausgiebigen Gebrauch von JavaScript.
Bitte aktiviert JavaScript in Eurem Browser.
Classic Aussehen
Thottbot Aussehen
Warlock macros
Antwort verfassen
Zur Forenübersicht zurückkehren
Beitrag von
user1
Please tell me that macros can make it easier to cast curse of agony, fear, and corruption on my target in that order?
Beitrag von
262250
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Beitrag von
user1
thank you guys :)
now i just have to throw in a /petfollow in the right places to keep the stupid imp from reminding the mobs what they were supposed to be doing. . .
Beitrag von
56282
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Beitrag von
RedwoodElf
What it's doing is, if you don't have an enemy target, it looks for one and then stops if it doesn't find one (Thus the /stopmacro) If it finds one, then it sics the pet and casts Curse of Agony.
Beitrag von
pelf
What it's doing is, if you don't have an enemy target, it looks for one and then stops if it doesn't find one (Thus the /stopmacro) If it finds one, then it sics the pet and casts Curse of Agony.
That's solid, but I wonder about
/targetenemy
. Seems like that would make it only
try
to target an enemy if you're targeting a friendly. Might want to remove that conditional. Also I'm pretty sure
target
in
/petattack target
is redundant. The pet will automatically attack your target. Removed that as well.
#showtooltip
/targetenemy
/stopmacro
/petattack
/castsequence reset=target Curse of Agony, Fear, Corruption
Beitrag von
RedwoodElf
That's solid, but I wonder about
/targetenemy
. Seems like that would make it only
try
to target an enemy if you're targeting a friendly.
I thought was true if you have no target (since is false if you don't have a target...at least I think it is, and noharm is the logical equivalent of not(harm))
Beitrag von
pelf
That's solid, but I wonder about
/targetenemy
. Seems like that would make it only
try
to target an enemy if you're targeting a friendly.
I thought was true if you have no target (since is false if you don't have a target...at least I think it is, and noharm is the logical equivalent of not(harm))
That is true, but it also means, "Don't try to target switch to a new enemy if I have an enemy selected." Hmm, perhaps you were trying to target lock until it died. If that's the case, revised to:
#showtooltip
/targetenemy
/stopmacro
/petattack
/castsequence reset=target Curse of Agony, Fear, Corruption
So, it will try to target a new enemy only if the existing target is either dead or friendly. Changed
noharm
to
help
for readability. Then stop the macro if no enemy was found.
Sorry for misinterpreting what you were doing if target lock was what you wanted.
Beitrag von
RedwoodElf
Wouldn't make any sense to NOT targetlock, since the reset on the castsequence is "reset=target" I dont think...heh
Beitrag von
pelf
Wouldn't make any sense to NOT targetlock, since the reset on the castsequence is "reset=target" I dont think...heh
Yeah, the absurdity of my correction dawned on me when I was writing that last post. However, the second initial correction stands and I think it's improved by the addition of the
condition.
Beitrag von
57105
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Beitrag von
pelf
Using
target
in
/petattack target
simply ensures that your pet attacks your current target, as opposed to whatever it wants to select as a target.
I'm approximately 99.5% sure that pets will attack your target when you tell them to attack without any literal indication of what to attack.
The
in
/targetenemy
was a boo boo - sorry! (though I went back and tried it and it works fine with it - weird)
That was fine. Putting that there provides the first part of a target lock so you don't switch to another target before you're done with your current one. Adding
before
finishes the target lock.
Antwort verfassen
Ihr seid nicht angemeldet. Bitte
meldet Euch an
, um eine Antwort einzusenden, oder
registriert Euch
falls Ihr noch nicht über ein Konto verfügt.