it is not 'world pvp' when people can't participateit wasnt "world pvp" to begin with
oh noez the grammer police is out.my horrible use of english has gotten pointed out once again/gasp...I am not serving the role of grammar police. I couldn't care less about grammar.The problem arises when your grammar is so horrible that I can't understand the meaning behind your sentence. That is what grammar was...you know...invented for.if you couldnt care less about grammer.you wouldnt of made the comment you made about my grammerbut eather way.if whats going on with the queueing for wintergrasp right now is whats going to happen with tol barad then my interest has pretty much been gone with tol baradI think you're missing the point.I made the comment about your grammar because I had NO idea what you were trying to say, because of the horrible grammar.And yeah, if its a queued arena, then I'm not looking forward to it much, although vehicle segments are still nice :(
so basicallyyou cant read good.ok,gotcha
so basicallyyou cant read good.ok,gotchaHm, at this point I'll just name this as a hopeless case.After rereading, I still have no idea what point you were trying to get across, so I will not argue with you anymore. Instead of giving me the response of a troll, maybe you could...rewrite it to be legible?
I don't think you actually fight in the seige weapons. I'm pretty sure you just drive them to the towers, then get out of them and the seige weapons destroy the tower automatically. It gives you something to 'guard' while you are on offense.I don't think it's going to be like WG where people will be chasing a single player in circles in a 300,000hp seige engine.The thing i vastly hate about WG2.0 is the matching system. In my opinion, it is not 'world pvp' when people can't participate. One of the things I really like about WG is that before nearly every match, there are people in town saying " WG in 5 mins" it's. It is nice to rally the troops.With WG2.0, it seems like people will be quiet and hope others don't queue.It's not world pvp, it's just another battleground that is limited to one server.So true, in fact.. the BG will CAP at the lowest number of players... lol This is going to be HORRIBLE... so say it's 3am and it's time for Tol Barad.. ok lets queue! There are 15 Horde queue in.. well then 15 Alliance get in.. now let's say you outnumber the Alliance oh... 6:1... so about 75 players are left out of the BG, because to keep things balanced... they're only letting 15 in... there will be a LOT of people left out of this BG on server with unbalanced pop. Though I will admit that during peak hours it will be alright... Blackrock - US will be interesting.. they outnumber alliance like 12 to 1? lol... a LOT of people are going to be kept out of that BG.Don't hope to get in on an unbalanced server then? You are supposed to not want to play on a faction where you outnumber the enemy by such a factor. Mission accomplished blizzard.
Go play another game. Its your money.ya,ill get right on that when theres a mmo out thats not made by blizzard that looks good enough to playand id say you need to pvp in more games then just WoW.there not doing pvp right,there doing it wrong.but eather way,maybe if blizzard cared enough in the first place the pvp wouldnt be so bad in this gameLet me guess, your version of pvp is 5v5 matches in which you have to kill the other team? WoW has nothing similar to that....o wait it does and it's called arenas.