lol, when i said "use wisely " i meant don't continue making yourself look ungracious and odious. *randomly accuses you of misusing "ungracious" and "odious" then moves on with his post without providing support*seewutididthur?i was holding out some hope that by offering an apology and a quasi compliment you would show everyone on this post that you actually are a sensible and honorable person. compliments and passive aggressive apologies may win over some peoples hearts but I like to think of myself as better than thatyou arent going to get out of this that easilyrather than do that you chose to keep using the same tired tactics of belittling and avoided posting anything substantive in response. denying their existence doesn't make them any less realyou rarely (notice i am stating that you have made some relevent arguments in response) rebut effectively. you seem to think that inane comments or unspecific responses I have challenged you multiple times to bring forth an unsubstantial response that I made, so that I can point out what you missed and why the response indeed is a rebuttalqualify as a rebuttal, which, i am sorry to say, it does not. a rebuttal requires proving why someone's opinion or statement was incorrect. see below.1) no, it doesn't, a rebuttal is merely a response2) who are you to say that there has been substantial "proof"? surely your biased opinion can't be the only one to speak to the outcome of this thread?@ 3rd parties: for the record Im aware this is not, and never was, an argument of proof, Im just covering all basesi will agree the example you gave was an attempt at actually refuting my claim, but that was the exception to most of your replies. it was actually the example you gave...I mean, really?there are more, to be sure, but that's the easiest and quickest to point out.what? that last sentence was... horrible. dodge notedpoint standsfirstly, when i said that your insulting comments don't help anyone learn, i meant the primary parties involved. by primary parties i mean you vs whoever you decide to argue against, thereby qualifying for the "anyone" word choice in my initial reply. a jury is just as important in a court of law as as the prosecution and defenseyou have only insulted people who disagree w/ you and that does not help them, if they indeed are wrong.you're wrong againi was not saying that someone else on this forum could not benefit from reading opposing opinions b/c that's obviously one of the reasons people visit forums. you were suggesting, like you still are now, that they are irrelevant to the discussioncare to elaborate on what that word was? it's getting harder to refute your comments b/c you aren't explicit in what you are saying. you know exactly what I was refering toso,dodge notedpoint standsnot providing specifics doesn't make for a solid argument. case in point the argument was laid out quite coherently immediately before the "pro tip" was madeattempting to quote it out of context doesn't help you, people can always go back and checkthat is b/c you lacked specificity and so my reply attempted to address the topic but you apparently meant something different. a little more effort on your part would help this argument go a lot further b/c i would be able to reply to your comment correctly if you explained yourself better.there are more, to be sure, but that's the easiest and quickest to point out. seriously? thats the best you can do?lol... not the best. read carefully the part where i said "the easiest and quickest to point out".fair enough, lets go back and have a look seeyou are on a public forumthere are alot more people participating in an argument (most only by lurking) than you and meits pretty clear to see what I meant by that statement, you're either an idiot, were trying to dodge the point by talking around it, or simply going back and trying to pad your argument.which was directed to caperon only. he was the first to reply to my post and he understood my humor and i understood his. your reply to that post was not done jokingly who are you to say any of those things? Caperons response could have very well meant to be a snide remark, just as your response could have very easily been sarcasm , and just as well as my remark could be a friendly meme tossed around as a sign of good faith.i felt i needed to reply to someone being rude for little to no reason. your previous posts in the thread were more than enough to garner a justifiably rude response from anyone on the forumsorry...look up preemptive, cop out and the word dictionary as well.*randomly accuses you of misusing "ungracious" and "odious" then moves on with his post without providing support*i agree. the posts between goshadstep2lose and i are getting ridiculous. I tried to weasel my way out of the argument while still saving face with a passive aggressive apology but only after I made all my responses: so that if he responded he would look like the &*!@, not me!fixed your last post there
I think we're long past done here.