Looks like they don't care about server imbalances as much as they care about the money they get from Paid Character Transfers and Character Faction Changes. I had to move from The Underbog since we were happy to get into the fortress once a week if we got lucky. Even if we started with Siege Engines right in front of the Horde's door we still wouldn't win simply because they outnumberd us by 20:1.
It's definitely the stuns that kill when you are so outnumbered. Instead of the proposed changes they should make you not stunnable when you get to a certain amount of tenacity.
Your screenshot says:Horde: Keep defended: 213 Keep captured: 1060Alliance: Keep defended: 82 Keep captured: 42-----This is impossible -- logic demands that the number of captures for Horde and Alliance is equal, or differs by only 1 (because capture indicates a change in control, and there are only 2 factions that can control it). It's only the number of times the keep is defended that can be vastly unequal.I conclude that the image you linked to is a fake.
Except that you didnt take in consideration the server restart giving WG to alliance.So be sure to factor everything in before telling me I am wrong.
It might not anymore, but it was for a very very long time defaulting it to alliance.
That statement was a poor choose of word from my bad english. Just meant that it didnt need to be a difference of 1.And the screenshot is not a fake. The book always showed weird numbers.
On one of my server, Alliance take control of WG only once per 1-2 days. So less than 7 times per week.And I recall on my server the numbers of the book were weird.
Maybe it is a dead PvE server where nobody care about PvP... go figure.
It'd still qualify as successful defence.Anyway, on Saurfang:Horde:Keep Defended: 321Keep Captured: 382Alliance:Keep Defended: 556Keep Captured: 382Can't check my other server because it's currently owned by the other faction.